Dyadic Flow Models for Nonstationary Gene Flow in Landscape Genomics

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Schwob, Michael R., Calzada, Nicholas M., Van Ee, Justin J., Gamba, Diana, Nelson, Rebecca A., Vahsen, Megan L., Adler, Peter B., Lasky, Jesse R., Hooten, Mevin B.
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866912781948682240
author Schwob, Michael R.
Calzada, Nicholas M.
Van Ee, Justin J.
Gamba, Diana
Nelson, Rebecca A.
Vahsen, Megan L.
Adler, Peter B.
Lasky, Jesse R.
Hooten, Mevin B.
author_facet Schwob, Michael R.
Calzada, Nicholas M.
Van Ee, Justin J.
Gamba, Diana
Nelson, Rebecca A.
Vahsen, Megan L.
Adler, Peter B.
Lasky, Jesse R.
Hooten, Mevin B.
contents The field of landscape genomics aims to infer how landscape features affect gene flow across space. Most landscape genomic frameworks assume the isolation-by-distance and isolation-by-resistance hypotheses, which propose that genetic dissimilarity increases as a function of distance and as a function of cumulative landscape resistance, respectively. While these hypotheses are valid in certain settings, other mechanisms may affect gene flow. For example, the gene flow of invasive species may depend on founder effects and multiple introductions. Such mechanisms are not considered in modern landscape genomic models. We extend dyadic models to allow for mechanisms that range-shifting and/or invasive species may experience by introducing dyadic spatially-varying coefficients (DSVCs) defined on source-destination pairs. The DSVCs allow the effects of landscape on gene flow to vary across space, capturing nonstationary and asymmetric connectivity. Additionally, we incorporate explicit landscape features as connectivity covariates, which are localized to specific regions of the spatial domain and may function as barriers or corridors to gene flow. Such covariates are central to colonization and invasion, where spread accelerates along corridors and slows across landscape barriers. The proposed framework accommodates colonization-specific processes while retaining the ability to assess landscape influences on gene flow. Our case study of the highly invasive cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) demonstrates the necessity of accounting for nonstationarity gene flow in range-shifting species.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2512_19035
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Dyadic Flow Models for Nonstationary Gene Flow in Landscape Genomics
Schwob, Michael R.
Calzada, Nicholas M.
Van Ee, Justin J.
Gamba, Diana
Nelson, Rebecca A.
Vahsen, Megan L.
Adler, Peter B.
Lasky, Jesse R.
Hooten, Mevin B.
Applications
Methodology
The field of landscape genomics aims to infer how landscape features affect gene flow across space. Most landscape genomic frameworks assume the isolation-by-distance and isolation-by-resistance hypotheses, which propose that genetic dissimilarity increases as a function of distance and as a function of cumulative landscape resistance, respectively. While these hypotheses are valid in certain settings, other mechanisms may affect gene flow. For example, the gene flow of invasive species may depend on founder effects and multiple introductions. Such mechanisms are not considered in modern landscape genomic models. We extend dyadic models to allow for mechanisms that range-shifting and/or invasive species may experience by introducing dyadic spatially-varying coefficients (DSVCs) defined on source-destination pairs. The DSVCs allow the effects of landscape on gene flow to vary across space, capturing nonstationary and asymmetric connectivity. Additionally, we incorporate explicit landscape features as connectivity covariates, which are localized to specific regions of the spatial domain and may function as barriers or corridors to gene flow. Such covariates are central to colonization and invasion, where spread accelerates along corridors and slows across landscape barriers. The proposed framework accommodates colonization-specific processes while retaining the ability to assess landscape influences on gene flow. Our case study of the highly invasive cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) demonstrates the necessity of accounting for nonstationarity gene flow in range-shifting species.
title Dyadic Flow Models for Nonstationary Gene Flow in Landscape Genomics
topic Applications
Methodology
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.19035