Eliminating Inductive Bias in Reward Models with Information-Theoretic Guidance

Fuente: arXiv
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Li, Zhuo, Cheng, Pengyu, Yu, Zhechao, Tong, Feifei, Gao, Anningzhe, Chang, Tsung-Hui, Wan, Xiang, Zhao, Erchao, Jiang, Xiaoxi, Jiang, Guanjun
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2025
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866913142913630208
author Li, Zhuo
Cheng, Pengyu
Yu, Zhechao
Tong, Feifei
Gao, Anningzhe
Chang, Tsung-Hui
Wan, Xiang
Zhao, Erchao
Jiang, Xiaoxi
Jiang, Guanjun
author_facet Li, Zhuo
Cheng, Pengyu
Yu, Zhechao
Tong, Feifei
Gao, Anningzhe
Chang, Tsung-Hui
Wan, Xiang
Zhao, Erchao
Jiang, Xiaoxi
Jiang, Guanjun
contents Reward models (RMs) are essential in reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) to align large language models (LLMs) with human values. However, RM training data is commonly recognized as low-quality, containing inductive biases that can easily lead to overfitting and reward hacking. For example, more detailed and comprehensive responses are usually human-preferred but with more words, leading response length to become one of the inevitable inductive biases. A limited number of prior RM debiasing approaches either target a single specific type of bias or model the problem with only simple linear correlations, \textit{e.g.}, Pearson coefficients. To mitigate more complex and diverse inductive biases in reward modeling, we introduce a novel information-theoretic debiasing method called \textbf{D}ebiasing via \textbf{I}nformation optimization for \textbf{R}M (DIR). Inspired by the information bottleneck (IB), we maximize the mutual information (MI) between RM scores and human preference pairs, while minimizing the MI between RM outputs and biased attributes of preference inputs. With theoretical justification from information theory, DIR can handle more sophisticated types of biases with non-linear correlations, broadly extending the real-world application scenarios for RM debiasing methods. In experiments, we verify the effectiveness of DIR with three types of inductive biases: \textit{response length}, \textit{sycophancy}, and \textit{format}. We discover that DIR not only effectively mitigates target inductive biases but also enhances RLHF performance across diverse benchmarks, yielding better generalization abilities. The code and training recipes are available at https://github.com/Qwen-Applications/DIR.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2512_23461
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Eliminating Inductive Bias in Reward Models with Information-Theoretic Guidance
Li, Zhuo
Cheng, Pengyu
Yu, Zhechao
Tong, Feifei
Gao, Anningzhe
Chang, Tsung-Hui
Wan, Xiang
Zhao, Erchao
Jiang, Xiaoxi
Jiang, Guanjun
Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Reward models (RMs) are essential in reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) to align large language models (LLMs) with human values. However, RM training data is commonly recognized as low-quality, containing inductive biases that can easily lead to overfitting and reward hacking. For example, more detailed and comprehensive responses are usually human-preferred but with more words, leading response length to become one of the inevitable inductive biases. A limited number of prior RM debiasing approaches either target a single specific type of bias or model the problem with only simple linear correlations, \textit{e.g.}, Pearson coefficients. To mitigate more complex and diverse inductive biases in reward modeling, we introduce a novel information-theoretic debiasing method called \textbf{D}ebiasing via \textbf{I}nformation optimization for \textbf{R}M (DIR). Inspired by the information bottleneck (IB), we maximize the mutual information (MI) between RM scores and human preference pairs, while minimizing the MI between RM outputs and biased attributes of preference inputs. With theoretical justification from information theory, DIR can handle more sophisticated types of biases with non-linear correlations, broadly extending the real-world application scenarios for RM debiasing methods. In experiments, we verify the effectiveness of DIR with three types of inductive biases: \textit{response length}, \textit{sycophancy}, and \textit{format}. We discover that DIR not only effectively mitigates target inductive biases but also enhances RLHF performance across diverse benchmarks, yielding better generalization abilities. The code and training recipes are available at https://github.com/Qwen-Applications/DIR.
title Eliminating Inductive Bias in Reward Models with Information-Theoretic Guidance
topic Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.23461