Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gokavarapu, Chandrasekhar
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.24339
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866917195614781440
author Gokavarapu, Chandrasekhar
author_facet Gokavarapu, Chandrasekhar
contents Rectified Linear Unit (ReLU) networks are piecewise-linear (PWL), so universal linear safety properties can be reduced to reasoning about linear constraints. Modern verifiers rely on SMT(LRA) procedures or MILP encodings, but a safety claim is only as trustworthy as the evidence it produces. We develop a proof-carrying verification core for PWL neural constraints on an input domain $D \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$. We formalize the exact PWL semantics as a union of polyhedra indexed by activation patterns, relate this model to standard exact SMT/MILP encodings and to the canonical convex-hull (ideal) relaxation of a bounded ReLU, and introduce a small certificate calculus whose proof objects live over $\mathbb{Q}$. Two certificate types suffice for the core reasoning steps: entailment certificates validate linear consequences (bound tightening and learned cuts), while Farkas certificates prove infeasibility of strengthened counterexample queries (branch-and-bound pruning). We give an exact proof kernel that checks these artifacts in rational arithmetic, prove soundness and completeness for linear entailment, and show that infeasibility certificates admit sparse representatives depending only on dimension. Worked examples illustrate end-to-end certified reasoning without trusting the solver beyond its exported witnesses.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2512_24339
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Proof-Carrying Verification for ReLU Networks via Rational Certificates
Gokavarapu, Chandrasekhar
Logic in Computer Science
Rings and Algebras
Primary: 68Q60, 68T07, 68W30, Secondary: 90C11, 52B11, 68T27, 90C05
Rectified Linear Unit (ReLU) networks are piecewise-linear (PWL), so universal linear safety properties can be reduced to reasoning about linear constraints. Modern verifiers rely on SMT(LRA) procedures or MILP encodings, but a safety claim is only as trustworthy as the evidence it produces. We develop a proof-carrying verification core for PWL neural constraints on an input domain $D \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$. We formalize the exact PWL semantics as a union of polyhedra indexed by activation patterns, relate this model to standard exact SMT/MILP encodings and to the canonical convex-hull (ideal) relaxation of a bounded ReLU, and introduce a small certificate calculus whose proof objects live over $\mathbb{Q}$. Two certificate types suffice for the core reasoning steps: entailment certificates validate linear consequences (bound tightening and learned cuts), while Farkas certificates prove infeasibility of strengthened counterexample queries (branch-and-bound pruning). We give an exact proof kernel that checks these artifacts in rational arithmetic, prove soundness and completeness for linear entailment, and show that infeasibility certificates admit sparse representatives depending only on dimension. Worked examples illustrate end-to-end certified reasoning without trusting the solver beyond its exported witnesses.
title Proof-Carrying Verification for ReLU Networks via Rational Certificates
topic Logic in Computer Science
Rings and Algebras
Primary: 68Q60, 68T07, 68W30, Secondary: 90C11, 52B11, 68T27, 90C05
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.24339