Korean Canonical Legal Benchmark: Toward Knowledge-Independent Evaluation of LLMs' Legal Reasoning Capabilities
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Oh, Hongseok, Hwang, Wonseok, On, Kyoung-Woon |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
LRAGE: Legal Retrieval Augmented Generation Evaluation Tool
by: Park, Minhu, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Park, Minhu, et al.
Published: (2025)
Does Alignment Tuning Really Break LLMs' Internal Confidence?
by: Oh, Hongseok, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Oh, Hongseok, et al.
Published: (2024)
Do Vision Encoders Truly Explain Object Hallucination?: Mitigating Object Hallucination via Simple Fine-Grained CLIPScore
by: Oh, Hongseok, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Oh, Hongseok, et al.
Published: (2025)
Evaluating Legal Reasoning Traces with Legal Issue Tree Rubrics
by: Lee, Jinu, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Lee, Jinu, et al.
Published: (2025)
LegalSearchLM: Rethinking Legal Case Retrieval as Legal Elements Generation
by: Kim, Chaeeun, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Kim, Chaeeun, et al.
Published: (2025)
Developing a Pragmatic Benchmark for Assessing Korean Legal Language Understanding in Large Language Models
by: Kim, Yeeun, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Kim, Yeeun, et al.
Published: (2024)
NESTLE: a No-Code Tool for Statistical Analysis of Legal Corpus
by: Cho, Kyoungyeon, et al.
Published: (2023)
by: Cho, Kyoungyeon, et al.
Published: (2023)
CALRK-Bench: Evaluating Context-Aware Legal Reasoning in Korean Law
by: Jung, JiHyeok, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Jung, JiHyeok, et al.
Published: (2026)
On the Consideration of AI Openness: Can Good Intent Be Abused?
by: Kim, Yeeun, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Kim, Yeeun, et al.
Published: (2024)
Exploiting LLMs' Reasoning Capability to Infer Implicit Concepts in Legal Information Retrieval
by: Nguyen, Hai-Long, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Nguyen, Hai-Long, et al.
Published: (2024)
IslamicLegalBench: Evaluating LLMs Knowledge and Reasoning of Islamic Law Across 1,200 Years of Islamic Pluralist Legal Traditions
by: Elmahjub, Ezieddin, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Elmahjub, Ezieddin, et al.
Published: (2026)
MAWARITH: A Dataset and Benchmark for Legal Inheritance Reasoning with LLMs
by: Bouchekif, Abdessalam, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Bouchekif, Abdessalam, et al.
Published: (2026)
Benchmarking the Legal Reasoning of LLMs in Arabic Islamic Inheritance Cases
by: AlDahoul, Nouar, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: AlDahoul, Nouar, et al.
Published: (2025)
SymBa: Symbolic Backward Chaining for Structured Natural Language Reasoning
by: Lee, Jinu, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Lee, Jinu, et al.
Published: (2024)
Are they lovers or friends? Evaluating LLMs' Social Reasoning in English and Korean Dialogues
by: Kim, Eunsu, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Kim, Eunsu, et al.
Published: (2025)
A Reasoning-Focused Legal Retrieval Benchmark
by: Zheng, Lucia, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Zheng, Lucia, et al.
Published: (2025)
Elevating Legal LLM Responses: Harnessing Trainable Logical Structures and Semantic Knowledge with Legal Reasoning
by: Yao, Rujing, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Yao, Rujing, et al.
Published: (2025)
Knowledge Graph Analysis of Legal Understanding and Violations in LLMs
by: Jha, Abha, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Jha, Abha, et al.
Published: (2025)
Are LLMs Court-Ready? Evaluating Frontier Models on Indian Legal Reasoning
by: Juvekar, Kush, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Juvekar, Kush, et al.
Published: (2025)
Investigating the Shortcomings of LLMs in Step-by-Step Legal Reasoning
by: Mishra, Venkatesh, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Mishra, Venkatesh, et al.
Published: (2025)
Enabling Discriminative Reasoning in LLMs for Legal Judgment Prediction
by: Deng, Chenlong, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Deng, Chenlong, et al.
Published: (2024)
Structured Definitions and Segmentations for Legal Reasoning in LLMs: A Study on Indian Legal Data
by: Khatri, Mann, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Khatri, Mann, et al.
Published: (2025)
Exploring the psychology of LLMs' Moral and Legal Reasoning
by: Almeida, Guilherme F. C. F., et al.
Published: (2023)
by: Almeida, Guilherme F. C. F., et al.
Published: (2023)
Automatic Legal Writing Evaluation of LLMs
by: Pires, Ramon, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Pires, Ramon, et al.
Published: (2025)
Evaluation Ethics of LLMs in Legal Domain
by: Zhang, Ruizhe, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Zhang, Ruizhe, et al.
Published: (2024)
Deterministic Legal Agents: A Canonical Primitive API for Auditable Reasoning over Temporal Knowledge Graphs
by: de Martim, Hudson
Published: (2025)
by: de Martim, Hudson
Published: (2025)
LegalMidm: Use-Case-Driven Legal Domain Specialization for Korean Large Language Model
by: Jang, Youngjoon, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Jang, Youngjoon, et al.
Published: (2026)
LegalRikai: Open Benchmark -- Benchmark for Complex Japanese Corporate Legal Tasks
by: Fujita, Shogo, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Fujita, Shogo, et al.
Published: (2025)
Ko-MuSR: A Multistep Soft Reasoning Benchmark for LLMs Capable of Understanding Korean
by: Park, Chanwoo, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Park, Chanwoo, et al.
Published: (2025)
Legal-DC: Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Legal Documents
by: Li, Yaocong, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Li, Yaocong, et al.
Published: (2026)
Legal$Δ$: Enhancing Legal Reasoning in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning with Chain-of-Thought Guided Information Gain
by: Dai, Xin, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Dai, Xin, et al.
Published: (2025)
UA-Legal-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Ukrainian Legal Reasoning
by: Ovcharov, Volodymyr
Published: (2026)
by: Ovcharov, Volodymyr
Published: (2026)
LeMAJ (Legal LLM-as-a-Judge): Bridging Legal Reasoning and LLM Evaluation
by: Enguehard, Joseph, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Enguehard, Joseph, et al.
Published: (2025)
ArabLegalEval: A Multitask Benchmark for Assessing Arabic Legal Knowledge in Large Language Models
by: Hijazi, Faris, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Hijazi, Faris, et al.
Published: (2024)
ALARB: An Arabic Legal Argument Reasoning Benchmark
by: Shairah, Harethah Abu, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Shairah, Harethah Abu, et al.
Published: (2025)
KoBLEX: Open Legal Question Answering with Multi-hop Reasoning
by: Lee, Jihyung, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Lee, Jihyung, et al.
Published: (2025)
BriefMe: A Legal NLP Benchmark for Assisting with Legal Briefs
by: Woo, Jesse, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Woo, Jesse, et al.
Published: (2025)
LegalEval-Q: A New Benchmark for The Quality Evaluation of LLM-Generated Legal Text
by: yunhan, Li, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: yunhan, Li, et al.
Published: (2025)
LegalOne: A Family of Foundation Models for Reliable Legal Reasoning
by: Li, Haitao, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Li, Haitao, et al.
Published: (2026)
A Korean Legal Judgment Prediction Dataset for Insurance Disputes
by: Kwak, Alice Saebom, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Kwak, Alice Saebom, et al.
Published: (2024)
Similar Items
-
LRAGE: Legal Retrieval Augmented Generation Evaluation Tool
by: Park, Minhu, et al.
Published: (2025) -
Does Alignment Tuning Really Break LLMs' Internal Confidence?
by: Oh, Hongseok, et al.
Published: (2024) -
Do Vision Encoders Truly Explain Object Hallucination?: Mitigating Object Hallucination via Simple Fine-Grained CLIPScore
by: Oh, Hongseok, et al.
Published: (2025) -
Evaluating Legal Reasoning Traces with Legal Issue Tree Rubrics
by: Lee, Jinu, et al.
Published: (2025) -
LegalSearchLM: Rethinking Legal Case Retrieval as Legal Elements Generation
by: Kim, Chaeeun, et al.
Published: (2025)