Cover Image

How Do Agentic AI Systems Address Performance Optimizations? A BERTopic-Based Analysis of Pull Requests

Fuente: arXiv

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Opu, Md Nahidul Islam, Islam, Shahidul, Asaduzzaman, Muhammad, Chowdhury, Shaiful
Format:	Preprint
Published:	2025
Subjects:	Software Engineering
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

How Do Agentic AI Systems Deal With Software Energy Concerns? A Pull Request-Based Study
by: Mitul, Tanjum Motin, et al.
Published: (2025)

Understanding the Issue Types in Open Source Blockchain-based Software Projects with the Transformer-based BERTopic
by: Opu, Md Nahidul Islam, et al.
Published: (2025)

A First Look at the Self-Admitted Technical Debt in Test Code: Taxonomy and Detection
by: Islam, Shahidul, et al.
Published: (2025)

LLM-Based Detection of Tangled Code Changes for Higher-Quality Method-Level Bug Datasets
by: Opu, Md Nahidul Islam, et al.
Published: (2025)

The Repeat Offenders: Characterizing and Predicting Extremely Bug-Prone Source Methods
by: Friesen, Ethan, et al.
Published: (2025)

Exploring Challenges in Test Mocking: Developer Questions and Insights from StackOverflow
by: Ahmed, Mumtahina, et al.
Published: (2025)

Moderately Mighty: To What Extent Can Internal Software Metrics Predict App Popularity at Launch?
by: Opu, Md Nahidul Islam, et al.
Published: (2025)

Robotics Meets Software Engineering: A First Look at the Robotics Discussions on Stackoverflow
by: Kidwai, Hisham, et al.
Published: (2024)

Evidence is All We Need: Do Self-Admitted Technical Debts Impact Method-Level Maintenance?
by: Chowdhury, Shaiful, et al.
Published: (2024)

HistoryFinder: Advancing Method-Level Source Code History Generation with Accurate Oracles and Enhanced Algorithm
by: Islam, Shahidul, et al.
Published: (2025)

Dependency Dilemmas: A Comparative Study of Independent and Dependent Artifacts in Maven Central Ecosystem
by: Shanto, Mehedi Hasan, et al.
Published: (2025)

Let's Make Every Pull Request Meaningful: An Empirical Analysis of Developer and Agentic Pull Requests
by: Yoshioka, Haruhiko, et al.
Published: (2026)

From Industry Claims to Empirical Reality: An Empirical Study of Code Review Agents in Pull Requests
by: Chowdhury, Kowshik, et al.
Published: (2026)

Automatic Pull Request Description Generation Using LLMs: A T5 Model Approach
by: Sakib, Md Nazmus, et al.
Published: (2024)

Think Harder and Don't Overlook Your Options: Revisiting Issue-Commit Linking with LLM-Assisted Retrieval
by: Morgan, Cole, et al.
Published: (2026)

The Good, the Bad, and the Monstrous: Predicting Highly Change-Prone Source Code Methods at Their Inception
by: Chowdhury, Shaiful
Published: (2024)

How Do Developers Use Code Suggestions in Pull Request Reviews?
by: Bouraffa, Abir, et al.
Published: (2025)

Insights into Security-Related AI-Generated Pull Requests
by: Rabbi, Md Fazle, et al.
Published: (2026)

The Quiet Contributions: Insights into AI-Generated Silent Pull Requests
by: Hasan, S M Mahedy, et al.
Published: (2026)

Do Autonomous Agents Contribute Test Code? A Study of Tests in Agentic Pull Requests
by: Haque, Sabrina, et al.
Published: (2026)

Why Are Agentic Pull Requests Merged or Rejected? An Empirical Study
by: Peralta, Sien Reeve O., et al.
Published: (2026)

Where Do AI Coding Agents Fail? An Empirical Study of Failed Agentic Pull Requests in GitHub
by: Ehsani, Ramtin, et al.
Published: (2026)

On the Use of Agentic Coding: An Empirical Study of Pull Requests on GitHub
by: Watanabe, Miku, et al.
Published: (2025)

Comparing AI Coding Agents: A Task-Stratified Analysis of Pull Request Acceptance
by: Pinna, Giovanni, et al.
Published: (2026)

Security in the Age of AI Teammates: An Empirical Study of Agentic Pull Requests on GitHub
by: Siddiq, Mohammed Latif, et al.
Published: (2026)

Empirical Analysis of Pull Requests for Google Summer of Code
by: Popoola, Saheed
Published: (2024)

These Aren't the Reviews You're Looking For How Humans Review AI-Generated Pull Requests
by: Duma, Kacper, et al.
Published: (2026)

Collaborator or Assistant? How AI Coding Agents Partition Work Across Pull Request Lifecycles
by: Jo, Young, et al.
Published: (2026)

On the Footprints of Reviewer Bots Feedback on Agentic Pull Requests in OSS GitHub Repositories
by: Fatima, Syeda Kaneez, et al.
Published: (2026)

The Value of Effective Pull Request Description
by: Pirouzkhah, Shirin, et al.
Published: (2026)

Generative AI for Pull Request Descriptions: Adoption, Impact, and Developer Interventions
by: Xiao, Tao, et al.
Published: (2024)

Code Change Characteristics and Description Alignment: A Comparative Study of Agentic versus Human Pull Requests
by: Pham, Dung, et al.
Published: (2026)

Humans Integrate, Agents Fix: How Agent-Authored Pull Requests Are Referenced in Practice
by: Khemissi, Islem, et al.
Published: (2026)

GitHub Actions: The Impact on the Pull Request Process
by: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Published: (2022)

The Impact of Documentation on Test Engagement in Pull Requests in OSS
by: Amore, Teal, et al.
Published: (2026)

A Study of Library Usage in Agent-Authored Pull Requests
by: Twist, Lukas, et al.
Published: (2025)

RAG-Reflect: Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Reflections for Comment-Driven Code Maintenance on Stack Overflow
by: Shanto, Mehedi Hasan, et al.
Published: (2026)

Change And Cover: Last-Mile, Pull Request-Based Regression Test Augmentation
by: Zhou, Zitong, et al.
Published: (2026)

Who Said CVE? How Vulnerability Identifiers Are Mentioned by Humans, Bots, and Agents in Pull Requests
by: Rooijendijk, Pien, et al.
Published: (2026)

How AI Coding Agents Communicate: A Study of Pull Request Description Characteristics and Human Review Responses
by: Watanabe, Kan, et al.
Published: (2026)