Scaling Charitable Incentives: Policy Selection, Beliefs, and Evidence from a Field Experiment

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sasaki, Shusaku, Ishihara, Takunori, Kurokawa, Hirofumi
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866915701370912768
author Sasaki, Shusaku
Ishihara, Takunori
Kurokawa, Hirofumi
author_facet Sasaki, Shusaku
Ishihara, Takunori
Kurokawa, Hirofumi
contents Why are interventions with weak evidence still adopted? We study charitable incentives for physical activity in Japan using three linked methods, including a randomized field experiment (N=808), a stakeholder belief survey (local government officials and private-sector employees, N=2,400), and a conjoint experiment on policy choice. Financial incentives increase daily steps by about 1,000, whereas charitable incentives deliver a precisely estimated null. Nonetheless, stakeholders greatly overpredict charitable incentives' effects on walking, participation, and prosociality. Conjoint choices show policymakers value step gains as well as other outcomes, shaping policy choice. Adoption thus reflects multidimensional beliefs and objectives, highlighting policy selection as a scaling challenge.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2512_24852
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Scaling Charitable Incentives: Policy Selection, Beliefs, and Evidence from a Field Experiment
Sasaki, Shusaku
Ishihara, Takunori
Kurokawa, Hirofumi
General Economics
Economics
Why are interventions with weak evidence still adopted? We study charitable incentives for physical activity in Japan using three linked methods, including a randomized field experiment (N=808), a stakeholder belief survey (local government officials and private-sector employees, N=2,400), and a conjoint experiment on policy choice. Financial incentives increase daily steps by about 1,000, whereas charitable incentives deliver a precisely estimated null. Nonetheless, stakeholders greatly overpredict charitable incentives' effects on walking, participation, and prosociality. Conjoint choices show policymakers value step gains as well as other outcomes, shaping policy choice. Adoption thus reflects multidimensional beliefs and objectives, highlighting policy selection as a scaling challenge.
title Scaling Charitable Incentives: Policy Selection, Beliefs, and Evidence from a Field Experiment
topic General Economics
Economics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.24852