Beyond Perfect APIs: A Comprehensive Evaluation of LLM Agents Under Real-World API Complexity

Fuente: arXiv
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Kim, Doyoung, Ren, Zhiwei, Hao, Jie, Sun, Zhongkai, Wang, Lichao, Ma, Xiyao, Ye, Zack, Han, Xu, Yin, Jun, Ji, Heng, Shen, Wei, Fan, Xing, Yao, Benjamin, Guo, Chenlei
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2026
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866911350063628288
author Kim, Doyoung
Ren, Zhiwei
Hao, Jie
Sun, Zhongkai
Wang, Lichao
Ma, Xiyao
Ye, Zack
Han, Xu
Yin, Jun
Ji, Heng
Shen, Wei
Fan, Xing
Yao, Benjamin
Guo, Chenlei
author_facet Kim, Doyoung
Ren, Zhiwei
Hao, Jie
Sun, Zhongkai
Wang, Lichao
Ma, Xiyao
Ye, Zack
Han, Xu
Yin, Jun
Ji, Heng
Shen, Wei
Fan, Xing
Yao, Benjamin
Guo, Chenlei
contents We introduce WildAGTEval, a benchmark designed to evaluate large language model (LLM) agents' function-calling capabilities under realistic API complexity. Unlike prior work that assumes an idealized API system and disregards real-world factors such as noisy API outputs, WildAGTEval accounts for two dimensions of real-world complexity: 1. API specification, which includes detailed documentation and usage constraints, and 2. API execution, which captures runtime challenges. Consequently, WildAGTEval offers (i) an API system encompassing 60 distinct complexity scenarios that can be composed into approximately 32K test configurations, and (ii) user-agent interactions for evaluating LLM agents on these scenarios. Using WildAGTEval, we systematically assess several advanced LLMs and observe that most scenarios are challenging, with irrelevant information complexity posing the greatest difficulty and reducing the performance of strong LLMs by 27.3%. Furthermore, our qualitative analysis reveals that LLMs occasionally distort user intent merely to claim task completion, critically affecting user satisfaction.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2601_00268
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Beyond Perfect APIs: A Comprehensive Evaluation of LLM Agents Under Real-World API Complexity
Kim, Doyoung
Ren, Zhiwei
Hao, Jie
Sun, Zhongkai
Wang, Lichao
Ma, Xiyao
Ye, Zack
Han, Xu
Yin, Jun
Ji, Heng
Shen, Wei
Fan, Xing
Yao, Benjamin
Guo, Chenlei
Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
We introduce WildAGTEval, a benchmark designed to evaluate large language model (LLM) agents' function-calling capabilities under realistic API complexity. Unlike prior work that assumes an idealized API system and disregards real-world factors such as noisy API outputs, WildAGTEval accounts for two dimensions of real-world complexity: 1. API specification, which includes detailed documentation and usage constraints, and 2. API execution, which captures runtime challenges. Consequently, WildAGTEval offers (i) an API system encompassing 60 distinct complexity scenarios that can be composed into approximately 32K test configurations, and (ii) user-agent interactions for evaluating LLM agents on these scenarios. Using WildAGTEval, we systematically assess several advanced LLMs and observe that most scenarios are challenging, with irrelevant information complexity posing the greatest difficulty and reducing the performance of strong LLMs by 27.3%. Furthermore, our qualitative analysis reveals that LLMs occasionally distort user intent merely to claim task completion, critically affecting user satisfaction.
title Beyond Perfect APIs: A Comprehensive Evaluation of LLM Agents Under Real-World API Complexity
topic Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.00268