Imagen de Portada

Do Autonomous Agents Contribute Test Code? A Study of Tests in Agentic Pull Requests

Fuente: arXiv

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Haque, Sabrina, Ingale, Sarvesh, Csallner, Christoph
Formato:	Preprint
Publicado:	2026
Materias:	Software Engineering
Acceso en línea:	Acceder al recurso
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

Ejemplares similares

Early Accessibility: Automating Alt-Text Generation for UI Icons During App Development
por: Haque, Sabrina, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

Inferring Alt-text For UI Icons With Large Language Models During App Development
por: Haque, Sabrina, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

On the Use of Agentic Coding: An Empirical Study of Pull Requests on GitHub
por: Watanabe, Miku, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

Where Do AI Coding Agents Fail? An Empirical Study of Failed Agentic Pull Requests in GitHub
por: Ehsani, Ramtin, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

The Impact of Documentation on Test Engagement in Pull Requests in OSS
por: Amore, Teal, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

Human-Agent versus Human Pull Requests: A Testing-Focused Characterization and Comparison
por: Milanese, Roberto, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

Let's Make Every Pull Request Meaningful: An Empirical Analysis of Developer and Agentic Pull Requests
por: Yoshioka, Haruhiko, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

Why Are Agentic Pull Requests Merged or Rejected? An Empirical Study
por: Peralta, Sien Reeve O., et al.
Publicado: (2026)

Code Change Characteristics and Description Alignment: A Comparative Study of Agentic versus Human Pull Requests
por: Pham, Dung, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

How Do Developers Use Code Suggestions in Pull Request Reviews?
por: Bouraffa, Abir, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

How Do Agentic AI Systems Deal With Software Energy Concerns? A Pull Request-Based Study
por: Mitul, Tanjum Motin, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

A Study of Library Usage in Agent-Authored Pull Requests
por: Twist, Lukas, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

From Industry Claims to Empirical Reality: An Empirical Study of Code Review Agents in Pull Requests
por: Chowdhury, Kowshik, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

The Quiet Contributions: Insights into AI-Generated Silent Pull Requests
por: Hasan, S M Mahedy, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

Change And Cover: Last-Mile, Pull Request-Based Regression Test Augmentation
por: Zhou, Zitong, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

Comparing AI Coding Agents: A Task-Stratified Analysis of Pull Request Acceptance
por: Pinna, Giovanni, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

How Do Agentic AI Systems Address Performance Optimizations? A BERTopic-Based Analysis of Pull Requests
por: Opu, Md Nahidul Islam, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

Empirical Analysis of Pull Requests for Google Summer of Code
por: Popoola, Saheed
Publicado: (2024)

Analyzing Message-Code Inconsistency in AI Coding Agent-Authored Pull Requests
por: Gong, Jingzhi, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

Collaborator or Assistant? How AI Coding Agents Partition Work Across Pull Request Lifecycles
por: Jo, Young, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

Who Said CVE? How Vulnerability Identifiers Are Mentioned by Humans, Bots, and Agents in Pull Requests
por: Rooijendijk, Pien, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

GitHub Actions: The Impact on the Pull Request Process
por: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

On the Footprints of Reviewer Bots Feedback on Agentic Pull Requests in OSS GitHub Repositories
por: Fatima, Syeda Kaneez, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

Security in the Age of AI Teammates: An Empirical Study of Agentic Pull Requests on GitHub
por: Siddiq, Mohammed Latif, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

The Value of Effective Pull Request Description
por: Pirouzkhah, Shirin, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

How AI Coding Agents Communicate: A Study of Pull Request Description Characteristics and Human Review Responses
por: Watanabe, Kan, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

Beyond Bug Fixes: An Empirical Investigation of Post-Merge Code Quality Issues in Agent-Generated Pull Requests
por: Cynthia, Shamse Tasnim, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

Generative AI for Pull Request Descriptions: Adoption, Impact, and Developer Interventions
por: Xiao, Tao, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

Humans Integrate, Agents Fix: How Agent-Authored Pull Requests Are Referenced in Practice
por: Khemissi, Islem, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

Quality Gatekeepers: Investigating the Effects ofCode Review Bots on Pull Request Activities
por: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

On Wasted Contributions: Understanding the Dynamics of Contributor-Abandoned Pull Requests
por: Khatoonabadi, SayedHassan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Insights into Security-Related AI-Generated Pull Requests
por: Rabbi, Md Fazle, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

When AI Teammates Meet Code Review: Collaboration Signals Shaping the Integration of Agent-Authored Pull Requests
por: Nachuma, Costain, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

What Developers Ask to ChatGPT in GitHub Pull Requests? an Exploratory Study
por: Silva, Julyanara R., et al.
Publicado: (2025)

Why Are AI Agent Involved Pull Requests (Fix-Related) Remain Unmerged? An Empirical Study
por: Alam, Khairul, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

What Do Contribution Guidelines Say About Software Testing?
por: Falcucci, Bruna, et al.
Publicado: (2026)

An Empirical Study on Developers Shared Conversations with ChatGPT in GitHub Pull Requests and Issues
por: Hao, Huizi, et al.
Publicado: (2024)

SWE-PRBench: Benchmarking AI Code Review Quality Against Pull Request Feedback
por: Kumar, Deepak
Publicado: (2026)

Evaluating the Impact of Data Cleaning on the Quality of Generated Pull Request Descriptions
por: Tire, Kutay, et al.
Publicado: (2025)

StaAgent: An Agentic Framework for Testing Static Analyzers
por: Nnorom, Elijah, et al.
Publicado: (2025)