Adaptive Retrieval for Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kim, Jongho, Kim, Jaeyoung, Hwang, Seung-won, Kim, Jihyuk, Kim, Yu Jin, Lee, Moontae
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866913028505600000
author Kim, Jongho
Kim, Jaeyoung
Hwang, Seung-won
Kim, Jihyuk
Kim, Yu Jin
Lee, Moontae
author_facet Kim, Jongho
Kim, Jaeyoung
Hwang, Seung-won
Kim, Jihyuk
Kim, Yu Jin
Lee, Moontae
contents We study leveraging adaptive retrieval to ensure sufficient "bridge" documents are retrieved for reasoning-intensive retrieval. Bridge documents are those that contribute to the reasoning process yet are not directly relevant to the initial query. While existing reasoning-based reranker pipelines attempt to surface these documents in ranking, they suffer from bounded recall. Naive solution with adaptive retrieval into these pipelines often leads to planning error propagation. To address this, we propose REPAIR, a framework that bridges this gap by repurposing reasoning plans as dense feedback signals for adaptive retrieval. Our key distinction is enabling mid-course correction during reranking through selective adaptive retrieval, retrieving documents that support the pivotal plan. Experimental results on reasoning-intensive retrieval and complex QA tasks demonstrate that our method outperforms existing baselines by 5.6%pt.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2601_04618
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Adaptive Retrieval for Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval
Kim, Jongho
Kim, Jaeyoung
Hwang, Seung-won
Kim, Jihyuk
Kim, Yu Jin
Lee, Moontae
Information Retrieval
We study leveraging adaptive retrieval to ensure sufficient "bridge" documents are retrieved for reasoning-intensive retrieval. Bridge documents are those that contribute to the reasoning process yet are not directly relevant to the initial query. While existing reasoning-based reranker pipelines attempt to surface these documents in ranking, they suffer from bounded recall. Naive solution with adaptive retrieval into these pipelines often leads to planning error propagation. To address this, we propose REPAIR, a framework that bridges this gap by repurposing reasoning plans as dense feedback signals for adaptive retrieval. Our key distinction is enabling mid-course correction during reranking through selective adaptive retrieval, retrieving documents that support the pivotal plan. Experimental results on reasoning-intensive retrieval and complex QA tasks demonstrate that our method outperforms existing baselines by 5.6%pt.
title Adaptive Retrieval for Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval
topic Information Retrieval
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.04618