Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Han, Chen, Tan, Jin, Yu, Bohan, Zheng, Wenzhen, Tang, Xijin
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.05606
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866912811120066560
author Han, Chen
Tan, Jin
Yu, Bohan
Zheng, Wenzhen
Tang, Xijin
author_facet Han, Chen
Tan, Jin
Yu, Bohan
Zheng, Wenzhen
Tang, Xijin
contents Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly instantiated as interacting agents in multi-agent systems (MAS), where collective decisions emerge through social interaction rather than independent reasoning. A fundamental yet underexplored mechanism in this process is conformity, the tendency of agents to align their judgments with prevailing group opinions. This paper presents a systematic study of how network topology shapes conformity dynamics in LLM-based MAS through a misinformation detection task. We introduce a confidence-normalized pooling rule that controls the trade-off between self-reliance and social influence, enabling comparisons between two canonical decision paradigms: Centralized Aggregation and Distributed Consensus. Experimental results demonstrate that network topology critically governs both the efficiency and robustness of collective judgments. Centralized structures enable immediate decisions but are sensitive to hub competence and exhibit same-model alignment biases. In contrast, distributed structures promote more robust consensus, while increased network connectivity speeds up convergence but also heightens the risk of wrong-but-sure cascades, in which agents converge on incorrect decisions with high confidence. These findings characterize the conformity dynamics in LLM-based MAS, clarifying how network topology and self-social weighting jointly shape the efficiency, robustness, and failure modes of collective decision-making.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2601_05606
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Conformity Dynamics in LLM Multi-Agent Systems: The Roles of Topology and Self-Social Weighting
Han, Chen
Tan, Jin
Yu, Bohan
Zheng, Wenzhen
Tang, Xijin
Multiagent Systems
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly instantiated as interacting agents in multi-agent systems (MAS), where collective decisions emerge through social interaction rather than independent reasoning. A fundamental yet underexplored mechanism in this process is conformity, the tendency of agents to align their judgments with prevailing group opinions. This paper presents a systematic study of how network topology shapes conformity dynamics in LLM-based MAS through a misinformation detection task. We introduce a confidence-normalized pooling rule that controls the trade-off between self-reliance and social influence, enabling comparisons between two canonical decision paradigms: Centralized Aggregation and Distributed Consensus. Experimental results demonstrate that network topology critically governs both the efficiency and robustness of collective judgments. Centralized structures enable immediate decisions but are sensitive to hub competence and exhibit same-model alignment biases. In contrast, distributed structures promote more robust consensus, while increased network connectivity speeds up convergence but also heightens the risk of wrong-but-sure cascades, in which agents converge on incorrect decisions with high confidence. These findings characterize the conformity dynamics in LLM-based MAS, clarifying how network topology and self-social weighting jointly shape the efficiency, robustness, and failure modes of collective decision-making.
title Conformity Dynamics in LLM Multi-Agent Systems: The Roles of Topology and Self-Social Weighting
topic Multiagent Systems
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.05606