Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hanley, Brian P., Tans, Pieter, Schuur, Edward A. G., Gardiner, Geoffrey, Keen, Steve, Smith, Adam
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06085
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866917294698921984
author Hanley, Brian P.
Tans, Pieter
Schuur, Edward A. G.
Gardiner, Geoffrey
Keen, Steve
Smith, Adam
author_facet Hanley, Brian P.
Tans, Pieter
Schuur, Edward A. G.
Gardiner, Geoffrey
Keen, Steve
Smith, Adam
contents Despite well-meaning scenarios that propose global CO2 emissions will decline presented in every IPCC report since 1988, the trend of global CO2 increase continues without significant change. Even if any individual nation manages to flatten its emissions, what matters is the trajectory of the globe. Together the gulf between climate science and climate economics, plus the urgent need for alternative methods of estimation, provided the incentives for development of our Ocean-Heat-Content (OHC) Physics and Time Macro Economic Model (OPTiMEM) system. To link NOAA damages to climate required creating a carbon consumption model to drive a physics model of climate. How fast could carbon be burned and how much coal, oil and natural gas was reasonably available? A carbon model driving climate meant burning the carbon, and modelling how the earth heated up. We developed this using the most recent best greenhouse gas equations and production models for CO2, CH4, N2O, and halogenated gases. This developed an ocean heat content model for the globe. Each step is validated against Known carbon consumption, CO2, temperature, and ocean heat content. This allows a physics founded model of climate costs to be projected.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2601_06085
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases -- OPTiMEM and the Heat Conjecture(s)
Hanley, Brian P.
Tans, Pieter
Schuur, Edward A. G.
Gardiner, Geoffrey
Keen, Steve
Smith, Adam
Theoretical Economics
Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics
Despite well-meaning scenarios that propose global CO2 emissions will decline presented in every IPCC report since 1988, the trend of global CO2 increase continues without significant change. Even if any individual nation manages to flatten its emissions, what matters is the trajectory of the globe. Together the gulf between climate science and climate economics, plus the urgent need for alternative methods of estimation, provided the incentives for development of our Ocean-Heat-Content (OHC) Physics and Time Macro Economic Model (OPTiMEM) system. To link NOAA damages to climate required creating a carbon consumption model to drive a physics model of climate. How fast could carbon be burned and how much coal, oil and natural gas was reasonably available? A carbon model driving climate meant burning the carbon, and modelling how the earth heated up. We developed this using the most recent best greenhouse gas equations and production models for CO2, CH4, N2O, and halogenated gases. This developed an ocean heat content model for the globe. Each step is validated against Known carbon consumption, CO2, temperature, and ocean heat content. This allows a physics founded model of climate costs to be projected.
title Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases -- OPTiMEM and the Heat Conjecture(s)
topic Theoretical Economics
Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06085