Fake Date Tests: Can We Trust In-sample Accuracy of LLMs in Macroeconomic Forecasting?
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866911551933382656 |
|---|---|
| author | Eliseev, Alexander Seleznev, Sergei |
| author_facet | Eliseev, Alexander Seleznev, Sergei |
| contents | Large language models (LLMs) are a type of machine learning tool that economists have started to apply in their empirical research. One such application is macroeconomic forecasting with backtesting of LLMs, even though they are trained on the same data that is used to estimate their forecasting performance. Can these in-sample accuracy results be extrapolated to the model's out-of-sample performance? To answer this question, we developed a family of prompt sensitivity tests and two members of this family, which we call the fake date tests. These tests aim to detect two types of biases in LLMs' in-sample forecasts: lookahead bias and context bias. According to the empirical results, none of the modern LLMs tested in this study passed our first test, signaling the presence of lookahead bias in their in-sample forecasts. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2601_07992 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Fake Date Tests: Can We Trust In-sample Accuracy of LLMs in Macroeconomic Forecasting? Eliseev, Alexander Seleznev, Sergei Econometrics Large language models (LLMs) are a type of machine learning tool that economists have started to apply in their empirical research. One such application is macroeconomic forecasting with backtesting of LLMs, even though they are trained on the same data that is used to estimate their forecasting performance. Can these in-sample accuracy results be extrapolated to the model's out-of-sample performance? To answer this question, we developed a family of prompt sensitivity tests and two members of this family, which we call the fake date tests. These tests aim to detect two types of biases in LLMs' in-sample forecasts: lookahead bias and context bias. According to the empirical results, none of the modern LLMs tested in this study passed our first test, signaling the presence of lookahead bias in their in-sample forecasts. |
| title | Fake Date Tests: Can We Trust In-sample Accuracy of LLMs in Macroeconomic Forecasting? |
| topic | Econometrics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.07992 |