Combinatorial comparison of general galled trees, time-consistent galled trees, and simplex time-consistent galled trees
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866912819903987712 |
|---|---|
| author | Agranat-Tamir, Lily Fuchs, Michael Gittenberger, Bernhard Rosenberg, Noah A. Seetharaman, Karthik V. |
| author_facet | Agranat-Tamir, Lily Fuchs, Michael Gittenberger, Bernhard Rosenberg, Noah A. Seetharaman, Karthik V. |
| contents | Rooted binary phylogenetic networks are extensions of rooted binary trees, adding reticulation nodes that are designed to represent evolutionary processes that involve hybridization events. Enumerative combinatorics studies have counted leaf-labeled phylogenetic networks in a variety of classes, finding that when the number of reticulations is fixed, the time-consistent galled trees are asymptotically less numerous than each of several network classes that had been previously examined. Here we provide enumerative results on two additional network classes: general galled trees and simplex time-consistent galled trees. We show that for a fixed number of galls, as the number of leaves goes to infinity, the asymptotic count of general galled trees is identical to that of time-consistent galled trees, whereas the count of simplex time-consistent galled trees is smaller. If the number of galls is not restricted, then the asymptotic approximations all differ: simplex time-consistent galled trees are less numerous than time-consistent galled trees, which are in turn less numerous than general galled trees. We also report a variety of additional results: recursions to count the studied networks with small numbers of leaves a fixed number of galls, as well as enumerative results for unlabeled networks in the classes that we investigate. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2601_08062 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Combinatorial comparison of general galled trees, time-consistent galled trees, and simplex time-consistent galled trees Agranat-Tamir, Lily Fuchs, Michael Gittenberger, Bernhard Rosenberg, Noah A. Seetharaman, Karthik V. Combinatorics Populations and Evolution Rooted binary phylogenetic networks are extensions of rooted binary trees, adding reticulation nodes that are designed to represent evolutionary processes that involve hybridization events. Enumerative combinatorics studies have counted leaf-labeled phylogenetic networks in a variety of classes, finding that when the number of reticulations is fixed, the time-consistent galled trees are asymptotically less numerous than each of several network classes that had been previously examined. Here we provide enumerative results on two additional network classes: general galled trees and simplex time-consistent galled trees. We show that for a fixed number of galls, as the number of leaves goes to infinity, the asymptotic count of general galled trees is identical to that of time-consistent galled trees, whereas the count of simplex time-consistent galled trees is smaller. If the number of galls is not restricted, then the asymptotic approximations all differ: simplex time-consistent galled trees are less numerous than time-consistent galled trees, which are in turn less numerous than general galled trees. We also report a variety of additional results: recursions to count the studied networks with small numbers of leaves a fixed number of galls, as well as enumerative results for unlabeled networks in the classes that we investigate. |
| title | Combinatorial comparison of general galled trees, time-consistent galled trees, and simplex time-consistent galled trees |
| topic | Combinatorics Populations and Evolution |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.08062 |