Regulatory gray areas of LLM Terms

Fuente: arXiv
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Davidson, Brittany I., Muir, Kate, Burnat, Florian A. D., Joinson, Adam N.
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2026
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866915729436049408
author Davidson, Brittany I.
Muir, Kate
Burnat, Florian A. D.
Joinson, Adam N.
author_facet Davidson, Brittany I.
Muir, Kate
Burnat, Florian A. D.
Joinson, Adam N.
contents Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into academic research pipelines; however, the Terms of Service governing their use remain under-examined. We present a comparative analysis of the Terms of Service of five major LLM providers (Anthropic, DeepSeek, Google, OpenAI, and xAI) collected in November 2025. Our analysis reveals substantial variation in the stringency and specificity of usage restrictions for general users and researchers. We identify specific complexities for researchers in security research, computational social sciences, and psychological studies. We identify `regulatory gray areas' where Terms of Service create uncertainty for legitimate use. We contribute a publicly available resource comparing terms across platforms (OSF) and discuss implications for general users and researchers navigating this evolving landscape.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2601_08415
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Regulatory gray areas of LLM Terms
Davidson, Brittany I.
Muir, Kate
Burnat, Florian A. D.
Joinson, Adam N.
Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
K.4.0; K.4.1; J.1; J.7
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into academic research pipelines; however, the Terms of Service governing their use remain under-examined. We present a comparative analysis of the Terms of Service of five major LLM providers (Anthropic, DeepSeek, Google, OpenAI, and xAI) collected in November 2025. Our analysis reveals substantial variation in the stringency and specificity of usage restrictions for general users and researchers. We identify specific complexities for researchers in security research, computational social sciences, and psychological studies. We identify `regulatory gray areas' where Terms of Service create uncertainty for legitimate use. We contribute a publicly available resource comparing terms across platforms (OSF) and discuss implications for general users and researchers navigating this evolving landscape.
title Regulatory gray areas of LLM Terms
topic Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
K.4.0; K.4.1; J.1; J.7
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.08415