Revisiting "Revisiting Neuron Coverage for DNN Testing: A Layer-Wise and Distribution-Aware Criterion": A Critical Review and Implications on DNN Coverage Testing

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Jinhan, Humbatova, Nargiz, Jahangirova, Gunel, Yoo, Shin, Tonella, Paolo
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866915726525202432
author Kim, Jinhan
Humbatova, Nargiz
Jahangirova, Gunel
Yoo, Shin
Tonella, Paolo
author_facet Kim, Jinhan
Humbatova, Nargiz
Jahangirova, Gunel
Yoo, Shin
Tonella, Paolo
contents We present a critical review of Neural Coverage (NLC), a state-of-the-art DNN coverage criterion by Yuan et al. at ICSE 2023. While NLC proposes to satisfy eight design requirements and demonstrates strong empirical performance, we question some of their theoretical and empirical assumptions. We observe that NLC deviates from core principles of coverage criteria, such as monotonicity and test suite order independence, and could more fully account for key properties of the covariance matrix. Additionally, we note threats to the validity of the empirical study, related to the ground truth ordering of test suites. Through our empirical validation, we substantiate our claims and propose improvements for future DNN coverage metrics. Finally, we conclude by discussing the implications of these insights.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2601_08729
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Revisiting "Revisiting Neuron Coverage for DNN Testing: A Layer-Wise and Distribution-Aware Criterion": A Critical Review and Implications on DNN Coverage Testing
Kim, Jinhan
Humbatova, Nargiz
Jahangirova, Gunel
Yoo, Shin
Tonella, Paolo
Software Engineering
We present a critical review of Neural Coverage (NLC), a state-of-the-art DNN coverage criterion by Yuan et al. at ICSE 2023. While NLC proposes to satisfy eight design requirements and demonstrates strong empirical performance, we question some of their theoretical and empirical assumptions. We observe that NLC deviates from core principles of coverage criteria, such as monotonicity and test suite order independence, and could more fully account for key properties of the covariance matrix. Additionally, we note threats to the validity of the empirical study, related to the ground truth ordering of test suites. Through our empirical validation, we substantiate our claims and propose improvements for future DNN coverage metrics. Finally, we conclude by discussing the implications of these insights.
title Revisiting "Revisiting Neuron Coverage for DNN Testing: A Layer-Wise and Distribution-Aware Criterion": A Critical Review and Implications on DNN Coverage Testing
topic Software Engineering
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.08729