Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.09521 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866910089191882752 |
|---|---|
| author | Wu, Peng-Ju Zhang, Bo-Yang Zhang, Ji-Guo Du, Guo-Hong Jin, Shang-Jie Zhang, Xin |
| author_facet | Wu, Peng-Ju Zhang, Bo-Yang Zhang, Ji-Guo Du, Guo-Hong Jin, Shang-Jie Zhang, Xin |
| contents | Two of the most pressing challenges in cosmology are the persistent discrepancy in measurements of the Hubble constant, referred to as the Hubble tension, and the deficit of baryons in the local Universe, known as the missing baryon problem. Fast radio bursts (FRBs) provide a unique probe of both the Hubble constant $H_0$ and the cosmic baryon density $Ω_{\rm b}$. However, constraints from FRBs alone suffer from a severe $H_0$-$Ω_{\rm b}$ degeneracy that prevents them from resolving either problem. We show that this degeneracy can be broken by combining FRBs with other emerging probes whose degeneracy directions differ in the $H_0$-$Ω_{\rm b}$ plane. Specifically, we quantify three multi-messenger approaches: FRBs paired with gravitational wave (GW) standard sirens, strong gravitational lensing (SGL) time delays, and 21 cm intensity mapping (IM) surveys. The combinations FRB+GW, FRB+SGL, and FRB+21 cm IM each deliver simultaneous constraints on $H_0$ and $Ω_{\rm b}$ better than (1%, 1.5%) in the $Λ$CDM model, and when dynamical dark energy is introduced, the constraining precision degrades gracefully as model complexity increases. Furthermore, within a model-independent framework, both FRB+GW and FRB+SGL constrain $H_0$ and $Ω_{\rm b}$ to precisions better than (1.5%, 3%). These precision levels are based on nominal observational expectations and would improve significantly under optimistic observational scenarios. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2601_09521 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Simultaneous determination of Hubble constant and cosmic baryon density: Forecasts for the synergy between FRBs and emerging probes Wu, Peng-Ju Zhang, Bo-Yang Zhang, Ji-Guo Du, Guo-Hong Jin, Shang-Jie Zhang, Xin Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology High Energy Physics - Phenomenology Two of the most pressing challenges in cosmology are the persistent discrepancy in measurements of the Hubble constant, referred to as the Hubble tension, and the deficit of baryons in the local Universe, known as the missing baryon problem. Fast radio bursts (FRBs) provide a unique probe of both the Hubble constant $H_0$ and the cosmic baryon density $Ω_{\rm b}$. However, constraints from FRBs alone suffer from a severe $H_0$-$Ω_{\rm b}$ degeneracy that prevents them from resolving either problem. We show that this degeneracy can be broken by combining FRBs with other emerging probes whose degeneracy directions differ in the $H_0$-$Ω_{\rm b}$ plane. Specifically, we quantify three multi-messenger approaches: FRBs paired with gravitational wave (GW) standard sirens, strong gravitational lensing (SGL) time delays, and 21 cm intensity mapping (IM) surveys. The combinations FRB+GW, FRB+SGL, and FRB+21 cm IM each deliver simultaneous constraints on $H_0$ and $Ω_{\rm b}$ better than (1%, 1.5%) in the $Λ$CDM model, and when dynamical dark energy is introduced, the constraining precision degrades gracefully as model complexity increases. Furthermore, within a model-independent framework, both FRB+GW and FRB+SGL constrain $H_0$ and $Ω_{\rm b}$ to precisions better than (1.5%, 3%). These precision levels are based on nominal observational expectations and would improve significantly under optimistic observational scenarios. |
| title | Simultaneous determination of Hubble constant and cosmic baryon density: Forecasts for the synergy between FRBs and emerging probes |
| topic | Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology High Energy Physics - Phenomenology |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.09521 |