Filtering for Copyright Enforcement in Europe after the Sabam cases
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866909990743179264 |
|---|---|
| author | Kulk, Stefan Borgesius, Frederik Zuiderveen |
| author_facet | Kulk, Stefan Borgesius, Frederik Zuiderveen |
| contents | Sabam, a Belgian collective rights management organisation, wanted an internet access provider and a social network site to install a filter system to enforce copyrights. In two recent judgments, the Court of Justice of the European Union decided that the social network site and the internet access provider cannot be required to install the filter system that Sabam asked for. Are these judgments good news for fundamental rights? This article argues that little is won for privacy and freedom of information. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2601_09739 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Filtering for Copyright Enforcement in Europe after the Sabam cases Kulk, Stefan Borgesius, Frederik Zuiderveen Computers and Society Sabam, a Belgian collective rights management organisation, wanted an internet access provider and a social network site to install a filter system to enforce copyrights. In two recent judgments, the Court of Justice of the European Union decided that the social network site and the internet access provider cannot be required to install the filter system that Sabam asked for. Are these judgments good news for fundamental rights? This article argues that little is won for privacy and freedom of information. |
| title | Filtering for Copyright Enforcement in Europe after the Sabam cases |
| topic | Computers and Society |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.09739 |