Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.10661 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866910217878372352 |
|---|---|
| author | Padmanabha, Mohan Kuhnert, Jörg Gauger, Nicolas R. Suchde, Pratik |
| author_facet | Padmanabha, Mohan Kuhnert, Jörg Gauger, Nicolas R. Suchde, Pratik |
| contents | In this paper, we propose improved wall-treatment strategies for meshfree methods applied to turbulent flows. The goal is to enhance wall-function handling in simulations of high-Reynolds-number turbulent flows and to understand the performance of turbulence models within these frameworks. While wall-function techniques are well established for mesh-based methods, their implementation in meshfree methods faces unique challenges. The main difficulties arise from scattered point distributions and dynamic point movement in Lagrangian frameworks. To address these issues, we evaluate a baseline closest-neighbor approach alongside two novel techniques: the nearest-band neighbor (NBN) method and the shifted boundary (SB) method. The NBN method enforces wall functions on a band of interior points, helping to maintain uniform point selection. On the other hand, the SB method virtually moves boundary points to a fixed wall-normal distance, eliminating the spatial noise associated with point movement. We evaluate these methods using turbulence closures: Spalart--Allmaras, $k-\varepsilon$, and $k-ω$ turbulence models. These methods are validated on 1D Couette flow, a turbulent flat plate, and a 3D NACA 0012 airfoil at high Reynolds numbers. Results demonstrate that both novel methods outperform the standard closest-neighbor approach on flat geometries. For flat plates, the SB method provides stability and perfectly smooth $y^+$ distributions. However, when applied to a curved NACA 0012 profile, the NBN method proves to be robust and flexible. In contrast, the SB method exhibits setbacks in numerical diffusion and premature flow separation on curved geometries. This is due to uncorrected normal-vector shifting and adverse pressure gradients. This work establishes the NBN method as a reliable, robust foundation for simulating turbulent flows over practical geometries using meshfree methods. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2601_10661 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Boundary treatment algorithms for meshfree RANS turbulence modeling Padmanabha, Mohan Kuhnert, Jörg Gauger, Nicolas R. Suchde, Pratik Fluid Dynamics In this paper, we propose improved wall-treatment strategies for meshfree methods applied to turbulent flows. The goal is to enhance wall-function handling in simulations of high-Reynolds-number turbulent flows and to understand the performance of turbulence models within these frameworks. While wall-function techniques are well established for mesh-based methods, their implementation in meshfree methods faces unique challenges. The main difficulties arise from scattered point distributions and dynamic point movement in Lagrangian frameworks. To address these issues, we evaluate a baseline closest-neighbor approach alongside two novel techniques: the nearest-band neighbor (NBN) method and the shifted boundary (SB) method. The NBN method enforces wall functions on a band of interior points, helping to maintain uniform point selection. On the other hand, the SB method virtually moves boundary points to a fixed wall-normal distance, eliminating the spatial noise associated with point movement. We evaluate these methods using turbulence closures: Spalart--Allmaras, $k-\varepsilon$, and $k-ω$ turbulence models. These methods are validated on 1D Couette flow, a turbulent flat plate, and a 3D NACA 0012 airfoil at high Reynolds numbers. Results demonstrate that both novel methods outperform the standard closest-neighbor approach on flat geometries. For flat plates, the SB method provides stability and perfectly smooth $y^+$ distributions. However, when applied to a curved NACA 0012 profile, the NBN method proves to be robust and flexible. In contrast, the SB method exhibits setbacks in numerical diffusion and premature flow separation on curved geometries. This is due to uncorrected normal-vector shifting and adverse pressure gradients. This work establishes the NBN method as a reliable, robust foundation for simulating turbulent flows over practical geometries using meshfree methods. |
| title | Boundary treatment algorithms for meshfree RANS turbulence modeling |
| topic | Fluid Dynamics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.10661 |