On the use of cross-fitting in causal machine learning with correlated units
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866913103989440512 |
|---|---|
| author | Balkus, Salvador V. Laith, Hasan Hejazi, Nima S. |
| author_facet | Balkus, Salvador V. Laith, Hasan Hejazi, Nima S. |
| contents | In causal machine learning, the fitting and evaluation of nuisance models are often performed on separate partitions, or folds, of the observed data. This technique, called cross-fitting, eliminates bias introduced by the use of black-box predictive algorithms. When study units may be correlated, such as in spatial, clustered, or time-series data, investigators often design bespoke forms of cross-fitting to minimize correlation between folds. We prove that, perhaps contrary to popular belief, this is typically unnecessary: performing cross fitting as if study units were independent still eliminates key bias terms even when units may be correlated. In simulation experiments with various correlation structures, we show that causal machine learning estimators achieve the same or improved bias and precision under cross-fitting that ignores correlation compared to techniques striving to eliminate correlation between folds. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2601_10899 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | On the use of cross-fitting in causal machine learning with correlated units Balkus, Salvador V. Laith, Hasan Hejazi, Nima S. Methodology In causal machine learning, the fitting and evaluation of nuisance models are often performed on separate partitions, or folds, of the observed data. This technique, called cross-fitting, eliminates bias introduced by the use of black-box predictive algorithms. When study units may be correlated, such as in spatial, clustered, or time-series data, investigators often design bespoke forms of cross-fitting to minimize correlation between folds. We prove that, perhaps contrary to popular belief, this is typically unnecessary: performing cross fitting as if study units were independent still eliminates key bias terms even when units may be correlated. In simulation experiments with various correlation structures, we show that causal machine learning estimators achieve the same or improved bias and precision under cross-fitting that ignores correlation compared to techniques striving to eliminate correlation between folds. |
| title | On the use of cross-fitting in causal machine learning with correlated units |
| topic | Methodology |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.10899 |