Cover Image

Change And Cover: Last-Mile, Pull Request-Based Regression Test Augmentation

Fuente: arXiv

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Zhou, Zitong, Paltenghi, Matteo, Kim, Miryung, Pradel, Michael
Format:	Preprint
Published:	2026
Subjects:	Software Engineering
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

QITE: Assembly-Level, Cross-Platform Testing of Quantum Computing Platforms
by: Paltenghi, Matteo, et al.
Published: (2025)

Analyzing Quantum Programs with LintQ: A Static Analysis Framework for Qiskit
by: Paltenghi, Matteo, et al.
Published: (2023)

A Survey on Testing and Analysis of Quantum Software
by: Paltenghi, Matteo, et al.
Published: (2024)

Testora: Using Natural Language Intent to Detect Behavioral Regressions
by: Pradel, Michael
Published: (2025)

The Impact of Documentation on Test Engagement in Pull Requests in OSS
by: Amore, Teal, et al.
Published: (2026)

Fuzz4All: Universal Fuzzing with Large Language Models
by: Xia, Chunqiu Steven, et al.
Published: (2023)

RippleGUItester: Change-Aware Exploratory Testing
by: Su, Yanqi, et al.
Published: (2026)

Names Are All You Need: Effective and Safe Regression Test Selection for Python
by: Wang, You, et al.
Published: (2026)

Let's Make Every Pull Request Meaningful: An Empirical Analysis of Developer and Agentic Pull Requests
by: Yoshioka, Haruhiko, et al.
Published: (2026)

The Value of Effective Pull Request Description
by: Pirouzkhah, Shirin, et al.
Published: (2026)

Fuzzing MLIR Compilers with Custom Mutation Synthesis
by: Limpanukorn, Ben, et al.
Published: (2024)

Targeted Testing of Compiler Optimizations via Grammar-Level Composition Styles
by: Zhou, Zitong, et al.
Published: (2025)

Do Autonomous Agents Contribute Test Code? A Study of Tests in Agentic Pull Requests
by: Haque, Sabrina, et al.
Published: (2026)

Human-Agent versus Human Pull Requests: A Testing-Focused Characterization and Comparison
by: Milanese, Roberto, et al.
Published: (2026)

Insights into Security-Related AI-Generated Pull Requests
by: Rabbi, Md Fazle, et al.
Published: (2026)

Empirical Analysis of Pull Requests for Google Summer of Code
by: Popoola, Saheed
Published: (2024)

GitHub Actions: The Impact on the Pull Request Process
by: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Published: (2022)

ChangeGuard: Validating Code Changes via Pairwise Learning-Guided Execution
by: Gröninger, Lars, et al.
Published: (2024)

Code Change Characteristics and Description Alignment: A Comparative Study of Agentic versus Human Pull Requests
by: Pham, Dung, et al.
Published: (2026)

Why Are Agentic Pull Requests Merged or Rejected? An Empirical Study
by: Peralta, Sien Reeve O., et al.
Published: (2026)

The Quiet Contributions: Insights into AI-Generated Silent Pull Requests
by: Hasan, S M Mahedy, et al.
Published: (2026)

A Study of Library Usage in Agent-Authored Pull Requests
by: Twist, Lukas, et al.
Published: (2025)

On the Use of Agentic Coding: An Empirical Study of Pull Requests on GitHub
by: Watanabe, Miku, et al.
Published: (2025)

Generative AI for Pull Request Descriptions: Adoption, Impact, and Developer Interventions
by: Xiao, Tao, et al.
Published: (2024)

How Do Developers Use Code Suggestions in Pull Request Reviews?
by: Bouraffa, Abir, et al.
Published: (2025)

Evaluating the Impact of Data Cleaning on the Quality of Generated Pull Request Descriptions
by: Tire, Kutay, et al.
Published: (2025)

Issue2Test: Generating Reproducing Test Cases from Issue Reports
by: Nashid, Noor, et al.
Published: (2025)

Improving Merge Pipeline Throughput in Continuous Integration via Pull Request Prioritization
by: Jungwirth, Maximilian, et al.
Published: (2025)

You Name It, I Run It: An LLM Agent to Execute Tests of Arbitrary Projects
by: Bouzenia, Islem, et al.
Published: (2024)

From Noise to Knowledge: Interactive Summaries for Developer Alerts
by: Yetiştiren, Burak, et al.
Published: (2025)

WhyFlow: Interrogative Debugger for Sensemaking Taint Analysis
by: Yetiştiren, Burak, et al.
Published: (2025)

How Do Agentic AI Systems Deal With Software Energy Concerns? A Pull Request-Based Study
by: Mitul, Tanjum Motin, et al.
Published: (2025)

How Do Agentic AI Systems Address Performance Optimizations? A BERTopic-Based Analysis of Pull Requests
by: Opu, Md Nahidul Islam, et al.
Published: (2025)

On the Footprints of Reviewer Bots Feedback on Agentic Pull Requests in OSS GitHub Repositories
by: Fatima, Syeda Kaneez, et al.
Published: (2026)

Comparing AI Coding Agents: A Task-Stratified Analysis of Pull Request Acceptance
by: Pinna, Giovanni, et al.
Published: (2026)

Humans Integrate, Agents Fix: How Agent-Authored Pull Requests Are Referenced in Practice
by: Khemissi, Islem, et al.
Published: (2026)

What Developers Ask to ChatGPT in GitHub Pull Requests? an Exploratory Study
by: Silva, Julyanara R., et al.
Published: (2025)

Quality Gatekeepers: Investigating the Effects ofCode Review Bots on Pull Request Activities
by: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Published: (2021)

Sphinx: Benchmarking and Modeling for LLM-Driven Pull Request Review
by: Zhang, Daoan, et al.
Published: (2026)

MELT: Mining Effective Lightweight Transformations from Pull Requests
by: Ramos, Daniel, et al.
Published: (2023)