Fairness in Healthcare Processes: A Quantitative Analysis of Decision Making in Triage

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Andreswari, Rachmadita, Fahrenkrog-Petersen, Stephan A., Mendling, Jan
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2026
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866910102057910272
author Andreswari, Rachmadita
Fahrenkrog-Petersen, Stephan A.
Mendling, Jan
author_facet Andreswari, Rachmadita
Fahrenkrog-Petersen, Stephan A.
Mendling, Jan
contents Fairness in automated decision-making has become a critical concern, particularly in high-pressure healthcare scenarios such as emergency triage, where fast and equitable decisions are essential. Process mining is increasingly investigating fairness. There is a growing area focusing on fairness-aware algorithms. So far, we know less how these concepts perform on empirical healthcare data or how they cover aspects of justice theory. This study addresses this research problem and proposes a process mining approach to assess fairness in triage by linking real-life event logs with conceptual dimensions of justice. Using the MIMICEL event log (as derived from MIMIC-IV ED), we analyze time, re-do, deviation and decision as process outcomes, and evaluate the influence of age, gender, race, language and insurance using the Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square and effect size measurements. These outcomes are mapped to justice dimensions to support the development of a conceptual framework. The results demonstrate which aspects of potential unfairness in high-acuity and sub-acute surface. In this way, this study contributes empirical insights that support further research in responsible, fairness-aware process mining in healthcare.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2601_11065
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Fairness in Healthcare Processes: A Quantitative Analysis of Decision Making in Triage
Andreswari, Rachmadita
Fahrenkrog-Petersen, Stephan A.
Mendling, Jan
Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
Fairness in automated decision-making has become a critical concern, particularly in high-pressure healthcare scenarios such as emergency triage, where fast and equitable decisions are essential. Process mining is increasingly investigating fairness. There is a growing area focusing on fairness-aware algorithms. So far, we know less how these concepts perform on empirical healthcare data or how they cover aspects of justice theory. This study addresses this research problem and proposes a process mining approach to assess fairness in triage by linking real-life event logs with conceptual dimensions of justice. Using the MIMICEL event log (as derived from MIMIC-IV ED), we analyze time, re-do, deviation and decision as process outcomes, and evaluate the influence of age, gender, race, language and insurance using the Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square and effect size measurements. These outcomes are mapped to justice dimensions to support the development of a conceptual framework. The results demonstrate which aspects of potential unfairness in high-acuity and sub-acute surface. In this way, this study contributes empirical insights that support further research in responsible, fairness-aware process mining in healthcare.
title Fairness in Healthcare Processes: A Quantitative Analysis of Decision Making in Triage
topic Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.11065