Image de couverture de livre

Legal Experts Disagree With Rationale Extraction Techniques for Explaining ECtHR Case Outcome Classification

Fuente: arXiv

Enregistré dans:

Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux:	Namazov, Mahammad, Koref, Tomáš, Habernal, Ivan
Format:	Preprint
Publié:	2026
Sujets:	Computation and Language
Accès en ligne:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Ajouter un tag Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!

Documents similaires

Mining Legal Arguments to Study Judicial Formalism
par: Koref, Tomáš, et autres
Publié: (2025)

Persuasion and Legal Reasoning in the ECtHR Rulings
par: Mężykowska, Aleksandra, et autres
Publié: (2023)

ECtHR-PCR: A Dataset for Precedent Understanding and Prior Case Retrieval in the European Court of Human Rights
par: Santosh, T. Y. S. S, et autres
Publié: (2024)

Privacy-Preserving Models for Legal Natural Language Processing
par: Yin, Ying, et autres
Publié: (2022)

Disagreeing Rationales: Rethinking Classification and Explainability Evaluation in Hate Speech Detection
par: Muscato, Benedetta, et autres
Publié: (2026)

The Conundrum of Trustworthy Research on Attacking Personally Identifiable Information Removal Techniques
par: Ochs, Sebastian, et autres
Publié: (2026)

At Long Last: The Recognition of Intersectional Discrimination at the ECtHR in FM v Russia
par: Shreya Atrey
Publié: (2025)

How reparametrization trick broke differentially-private text representation learning
par: Habernal, Ivan
Publié: (2022)

Chapter 10 Speaking the same language? Comparing judicial restraint at the ECtHR and the ECJ
par: Mjöll Arnardóttir, Oddný, et autres
Publié: (2021)

Efficient Tool-Calling Multi-Expert NPC Agent for Commonsense Persona-Grounded Dialogue
par: Nuriyev, Mahammad
Publié: (2025)

A Comprehensive Survey on Legal Summarization: Challenges and Future Directions
par: Akter, Mousumi, et autres
Publié: (2025)

Private Synthetic Text Generation with Diffusion Models
par: Ochs, Sebastian, et autres
Publié: (2024)

LaCour!: Enabling Research on Argumentation in Hearings of the European Court of Human Rights
par: Held, Lena, et autres
Publié: (2023)

From Dissonance to Insights: Dissecting Disagreements in Rationale Construction for Case Outcome Classification
par: Xu, Shanshan, et autres
Publié: (2023)

The role of the constitutional courts and ECtHR in shaping negotiated justice mechanisms – a comparative perspective1
par: Dorota Czerwińska
Publié: (2022)

DP-BART for Privatized Text Rewriting under Local Differential Privacy
par: Igamberdiev, Timour, et autres
Publié: (2023)

Differentially-private text generation degrades output language quality
par: Çano, Erion, et autres
Publié: (2025)

Disinformation, Foreign Interference and the Right to Free Elections before the ECtHR in Bradshaw and Others v United Kingdom
par: Katie Pentney
Publié: (2026)

Agree, Disagree, Explain: Decomposing Human Label Variation in NLI through the Lens of Explanations
par: Hong, Pingjun, et autres
Publié: (2025)

THE RIGHT TO A BALANCED AND HEALTHFUL ECOLOGY IN THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND CASE LAW OF THE ECtHR
par: Elena Evgenyevna Gulyaeva
Publié: (2022)

Self-Explaining Hate Speech Detection with Moral Rationales
par: Vargas, Francielle, et autres
Publié: (2026)

To share or not to share: What risks would laypeople accept to give sensitive data to differentially-private NLP systems?
par: Weiss, Christopher, et autres
Publié: (2023)

MARE: Multi-Aspect Rationale Extractor on Unsupervised Rationale Extraction
par: Jiang, Han, et autres
Publié: (2024)

When Annotators Disagree, Topology Explains: Mapper, a Topological Tool for Exploring Text Embedding Geometry and Ambiguity
par: Rair, Nisrine, et autres
Publié: (2025)

Granularity is crucial when applying differential privacy to text: An investigation for neural machine translation
par: Vu, Doan Nam Long, et autres
Publié: (2024)

PILOT: Legal Case Outcome Prediction with Case Law
par: Cao, Lang, et autres
Publié: (2024)

Through the Lens of Split Vote: Exploring Disagreement, Difficulty and Calibration in Legal Case Outcome Classification
par: Xu, Shanshan, et autres
Publié: (2024)

Is Your Prompt Safe? Investigating Prompt Injection Attacks Against Open-Source LLMs
par: Wang, Jiawen, et autres
Publié: (2025)

Diagnosing Hate Speech Classification: Where Do Humans and Machines Disagree, and Why?
par: Yang, Xilin
Publié: (2024)

Aligning Attention with Human Rationales for Self-Explaining Hate Speech Detection
par: Eilertsen, Brage, et autres
Publié: (2025)

LexRel: Benchmarking Legal Relation Extraction for Chinese Civil Cases
par: Cai, Yida, et autres
Publié: (2025)

Model Interpretability and Rationale Extraction by Input Mask Optimization
par: Brinner, Marc, et autres
Publié: (2025)

Enhancing Relation Extraction via Supervised Rationale Verification and Feedback
par: Li, Yongqi, et autres
Publié: (2024)

Will Annotators Disagree? Identifying Subjectivity in Value-Laden Arguments
par: Homayounirad, Amir, et autres
Publié: (2025)

Agree to Disagree? A Meta-Evaluation of LLM Misgendering
par: Subramonian, Arjun, et autres
Publié: (2025)

Japanese Tort-case Dataset for Rationale-supported Legal Judgment Prediction
par: Yamada, Hiroaki, et autres
Publié: (2023)

The Impact of Inference Acceleration on Bias of LLMs
par: Kirsten, Elisabeth, et autres
Publié: (2024)

Accurate and Data-Efficient Toxicity Prediction when Annotators Disagree
par: Jaggi, Harbani, et autres
Publié: (2024)

Explaining word embeddings with perfect fidelity: Case study in research impact prediction
par: Dvorackova, Lucie, et autres
Publié: (2024)

That's So FETCH: Fashioning Ensemble Techniques for LLM Classification in Civil Legal Intake and Referral
par: Steenhuis, Quinten
Publié: (2025)