Disjoint non-forking amalgamation in stable AECs

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Beard, Jeremy
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2026
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866912838102024192
author Beard, Jeremy
author_facet Beard, Jeremy
contents The disjoint amalgamation property (DAP), which asserts that all spans of a class of models can be amalgamated with minimal intersection, is an important property in the context of abstract elementary classes, with connections to both Grossberg's question and Shelah's categoricity conjecture. We prove that, in a nice AEC $\mathbf{K}$ stable in $λ\geq \operatorname{LS}(\mathbf{K})$ with a strong enough independence relation, all high cofinality $λ$-limit models are disjoint (non-forking) amalgamation bases. $\textbf{Theorem.}$ Let $\mathbf{K}$ be an AEC stable in $λ$, where $\mathbf{K}_λ$ has AP, JEP, and NMM, and let $\mathbf{K}'$ be some AC where $\mathbf{K}_{(λ,\geqκ)} \subseteq \mathbf{K}' \subseteq \mathbf{K}_λ$. Suppose there is an independence relation on $\mathbf{K}'$ satisfying uniqueness, existence, non-forking amalgamation, $\mathbf{K}_{(λ,\geqκ)}$-universal continuity* in $\mathbf{K}_λ$, and $(\geq κ)$-local character. Assume $M_0, M_1, M_2 \in \mathbf{K}_{(λ,\geqκ)}$, and that $M_0 \leq_{\mathbf{K}} M_l$ and $a_l \in M_l$ for $l = 1, 2$. Then there exist $N \in \mathbf{K}_{(λ,\geqκ)}$ and $f_l : M_l \rightarrow N$ fixing $M_0$ for $l = 1, 2$ such that $\operatorname{gtp}(f_l(a_l)/f_{3-l}[M_{3-l}], N)$ does not fork over $M_0$ and $f_1[M_1] \cap f_2[M_2] = M_0$. That is, our independence relation has disjoint non-forking amalgamation in $\mathbf{K}_{(λ,\geqκ)}$. In particular, every $M_0 \in \mathbf{K}_{(λ,\geqκ)}$ is a disjoint amalgamation base in $\mathbf{K}_λ$. The hypotheses on the independence relation can be weakened (closer to $λ$-non-splitting in $λ$-stable AECs) if we are willing to give up the `non-forking' conditions of the amalgamation.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2601_12439
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Disjoint non-forking amalgamation in stable AECs
Beard, Jeremy
Logic
Primary: 03C48. Secondary: 03C45, 03C50
The disjoint amalgamation property (DAP), which asserts that all spans of a class of models can be amalgamated with minimal intersection, is an important property in the context of abstract elementary classes, with connections to both Grossberg's question and Shelah's categoricity conjecture. We prove that, in a nice AEC $\mathbf{K}$ stable in $λ\geq \operatorname{LS}(\mathbf{K})$ with a strong enough independence relation, all high cofinality $λ$-limit models are disjoint (non-forking) amalgamation bases. $\textbf{Theorem.}$ Let $\mathbf{K}$ be an AEC stable in $λ$, where $\mathbf{K}_λ$ has AP, JEP, and NMM, and let $\mathbf{K}'$ be some AC where $\mathbf{K}_{(λ,\geqκ)} \subseteq \mathbf{K}' \subseteq \mathbf{K}_λ$. Suppose there is an independence relation on $\mathbf{K}'$ satisfying uniqueness, existence, non-forking amalgamation, $\mathbf{K}_{(λ,\geqκ)}$-universal continuity* in $\mathbf{K}_λ$, and $(\geq κ)$-local character. Assume $M_0, M_1, M_2 \in \mathbf{K}_{(λ,\geqκ)}$, and that $M_0 \leq_{\mathbf{K}} M_l$ and $a_l \in M_l$ for $l = 1, 2$. Then there exist $N \in \mathbf{K}_{(λ,\geqκ)}$ and $f_l : M_l \rightarrow N$ fixing $M_0$ for $l = 1, 2$ such that $\operatorname{gtp}(f_l(a_l)/f_{3-l}[M_{3-l}], N)$ does not fork over $M_0$ and $f_1[M_1] \cap f_2[M_2] = M_0$. That is, our independence relation has disjoint non-forking amalgamation in $\mathbf{K}_{(λ,\geqκ)}$. In particular, every $M_0 \in \mathbf{K}_{(λ,\geqκ)}$ is a disjoint amalgamation base in $\mathbf{K}_λ$. The hypotheses on the independence relation can be weakened (closer to $λ$-non-splitting in $λ$-stable AECs) if we are willing to give up the `non-forking' conditions of the amalgamation.
title Disjoint non-forking amalgamation in stable AECs
topic Logic
Primary: 03C48. Secondary: 03C45, 03C50
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.12439