Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.13217 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866915739369209856 |
|---|---|
| author | Chen, Bingsen Li, Boyan Nie, Ping Zhang, Yuyu Ye, Xi Zhao, Chen |
| author_facet | Chen, Bingsen Li, Boyan Nie, Ping Zhang, Yuyu Ye, Xi Zhao, Chen |
| contents | Existing benchmarks for Deep Research Agents (DRAs) treat report generation as a single-shot writing task, which fundamentally diverges from how human researchers iteratively draft and revise reports via self-reflection or peer feedback. Whether DRAs can reliably revise reports with user feedback remains unexplored. We introduce Mr Dre, an evaluation suite that establishes multi-turn report revision as a new evaluation axis for DRAs. Mr Dre consists of (1) a unified long-form report evaluation protocol spanning comprehensiveness, factuality, and presentation, and (2) a human-verified feedback simulation pipeline for multi-turn revision. Our analysis of five diverse DRAs reveals a critical limitation: while agents can address most user feedback, they also regress on 16-27% of previously covered content and citation quality. Over multiple revision turns, even the best-performing agents leave significant headroom, as they continue to disrupt content outside the feedback's scope and fail to preserve earlier edits. We further show that these issues are not easily resolvable through inference-time fixes such as prompt engineering and a dedicated sub-agent for report revision. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2601_13217 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Beyond Single-shot Writing: Deep Research Agents are Unreliable at Multi-turn Report Revision Chen, Bingsen Li, Boyan Nie, Ping Zhang, Yuyu Ye, Xi Zhao, Chen Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence Existing benchmarks for Deep Research Agents (DRAs) treat report generation as a single-shot writing task, which fundamentally diverges from how human researchers iteratively draft and revise reports via self-reflection or peer feedback. Whether DRAs can reliably revise reports with user feedback remains unexplored. We introduce Mr Dre, an evaluation suite that establishes multi-turn report revision as a new evaluation axis for DRAs. Mr Dre consists of (1) a unified long-form report evaluation protocol spanning comprehensiveness, factuality, and presentation, and (2) a human-verified feedback simulation pipeline for multi-turn revision. Our analysis of five diverse DRAs reveals a critical limitation: while agents can address most user feedback, they also regress on 16-27% of previously covered content and citation quality. Over multiple revision turns, even the best-performing agents leave significant headroom, as they continue to disrupt content outside the feedback's scope and fail to preserve earlier edits. We further show that these issues are not easily resolvable through inference-time fixes such as prompt engineering and a dedicated sub-agent for report revision. |
| title | Beyond Single-shot Writing: Deep Research Agents are Unreliable at Multi-turn Report Revision |
| topic | Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.13217 |