Human-AI Collaboration in Radiology: The Case of Pulmonary Embolism
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866909995382079488 |
|---|---|
| author | Goldsmith-Pinkham, Paul Tan, Chenhao Zentefis, Alexander K. |
| author_facet | Goldsmith-Pinkham, Paul Tan, Chenhao Zentefis, Alexander K. |
| contents | We study how radiologists use AI to diagnose pulmonary embolism (PE), tracking over 100,000 scans interpreted by nearly 400 radiologists during the staggered rollout of a real-world FDA-approved diagnostic platform in a hospital system. When AI flags PE, radiologists agree 84% of the time; when AI predicts no PE, they agree 97%. Disagreement evolves substantially: radiologists initially reject AI-positive PEs in 30% of cases, dropping to 12% by year two. Despite a 16% increase in scan volume, diagnostic speed remains stable while per-radiologist monthly volumes nearly double, with no change in patient mortality -- suggesting AI improves workflow without compromising outcomes. We document significant heterogeneity in AI collaboration: some radiologists reject AI-flagged PEs half the time while others accept nearly always; female radiologists are 6 percentage points less likely to override AI than male radiologists. Moderate AI engagement is associated with the highest agreement, whereas both low and high engagement show more disagreement. Follow-up imaging reveals that when radiologists override AI to diagnose PE, 54% of subsequent scans show both agreeing on no PE within 30 days. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2601_13379 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Human-AI Collaboration in Radiology: The Case of Pulmonary Embolism Goldsmith-Pinkham, Paul Tan, Chenhao Zentefis, Alexander K. General Economics Economics We study how radiologists use AI to diagnose pulmonary embolism (PE), tracking over 100,000 scans interpreted by nearly 400 radiologists during the staggered rollout of a real-world FDA-approved diagnostic platform in a hospital system. When AI flags PE, radiologists agree 84% of the time; when AI predicts no PE, they agree 97%. Disagreement evolves substantially: radiologists initially reject AI-positive PEs in 30% of cases, dropping to 12% by year two. Despite a 16% increase in scan volume, diagnostic speed remains stable while per-radiologist monthly volumes nearly double, with no change in patient mortality -- suggesting AI improves workflow without compromising outcomes. We document significant heterogeneity in AI collaboration: some radiologists reject AI-flagged PEs half the time while others accept nearly always; female radiologists are 6 percentage points less likely to override AI than male radiologists. Moderate AI engagement is associated with the highest agreement, whereas both low and high engagement show more disagreement. Follow-up imaging reveals that when radiologists override AI to diagnose PE, 54% of subsequent scans show both agreeing on no PE within 30 days. |
| title | Human-AI Collaboration in Radiology: The Case of Pulmonary Embolism |
| topic | General Economics Economics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.13379 |