Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Liang, Zhaohui, Ma, Chengyuan, Long, Keke, Li, Xiaopeng
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2026
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.13389
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866908775395360768
author Liang, Zhaohui
Ma, Chengyuan
Long, Keke
Li, Xiaopeng
author_facet Liang, Zhaohui
Ma, Chengyuan
Long, Keke
Li, Xiaopeng
contents Eco-driving strategies have demonstrated substantial potential for improving energy efficiency and reducing emissions, especially at signalized intersections. However, evaluations of eco-driving methods typically rely on simplified simulation or experimental conditions, where certain assumptions are made to manage complexity and experimental control. This study introduces a unified framework to evaluate eco-driving strategies through the lens of two complementary criteria: control robustness and environmental resilience. We define formal indicators that quantify performance degradation caused by internal execution variability and external environmental disturbances, respectively. These indicators are then applied to assess multiple eco-driving controllers through real-world vehicle experiments. The results reveal key tradeoffs between tracking accuracy and adaptability, showing that optimization-based controllers offer more consistent performance across varying disturbance levels, while analytical controllers may perform comparably under nominal conditions but exhibit greater sensitivity to execution and timing variability.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2601_13389
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Robustness and Resilience Evaluation of Eco-Driving Strategies at Signalized Intersections
Liang, Zhaohui
Ma, Chengyuan
Long, Keke
Li, Xiaopeng
Robotics
Eco-driving strategies have demonstrated substantial potential for improving energy efficiency and reducing emissions, especially at signalized intersections. However, evaluations of eco-driving methods typically rely on simplified simulation or experimental conditions, where certain assumptions are made to manage complexity and experimental control. This study introduces a unified framework to evaluate eco-driving strategies through the lens of two complementary criteria: control robustness and environmental resilience. We define formal indicators that quantify performance degradation caused by internal execution variability and external environmental disturbances, respectively. These indicators are then applied to assess multiple eco-driving controllers through real-world vehicle experiments. The results reveal key tradeoffs between tracking accuracy and adaptability, showing that optimization-based controllers offer more consistent performance across varying disturbance levels, while analytical controllers may perform comparably under nominal conditions but exhibit greater sensitivity to execution and timing variability.
title Robustness and Resilience Evaluation of Eco-Driving Strategies at Signalized Intersections
topic Robotics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.13389