Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.13649 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866917211343421440 |
|---|---|
| author | Zhou, Xiaolin Luo, Zheng Gao, Yicheng Chen, Qixuan Hu, Xiyang Zhao, Yue Liu, Ruishan |
| author_facet | Zhou, Xiaolin Luo, Zheng Gao, Yicheng Chen, Qixuan Hu, Xiyang Zhao, Yue Liu, Ruishan |
| contents | Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have incentivized the development of LLM-as-a-judge, an application of LLMs where they are used as judges to decide the quality of a certain piece of text given a certain context. However, previous studies have demonstrated that LLM-as-a-judge can be biased towards different aspects of the judged texts, which often do not align with human preference. One of the identified biases is language bias, which indicates that the decision of LLM-as-a-judge can differ based on the language of the judged texts. In this paper, we study two types of language bias in pairwise LLM-as-a-judge: (1) performance disparity between languages when the judge is prompted to compare options from the same language, and (2) bias towards options written in major languages when the judge is prompted to compare options of two different languages. We find that for same-language judging, there exist significant performance disparities across language families, with European languages consistently outperforming African languages, and this bias is more pronounced in culturally-related subjects. For inter-language judging, we observe that most models favor English answers, and that this preference is influenced more by answer language than question language. Finally, we investigate whether language bias is in fact caused by low-perplexity bias, a previously identified bias of LLM-as-a-judge, and we find that while perplexity is slightly correlated with language bias, language bias cannot be fully explained by perplexity only. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2601_13649 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Fairness or Fluency? An Investigation into Language Bias of Pairwise LLM-as-a-Judge Zhou, Xiaolin Luo, Zheng Gao, Yicheng Chen, Qixuan Hu, Xiyang Zhao, Yue Liu, Ruishan Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have incentivized the development of LLM-as-a-judge, an application of LLMs where they are used as judges to decide the quality of a certain piece of text given a certain context. However, previous studies have demonstrated that LLM-as-a-judge can be biased towards different aspects of the judged texts, which often do not align with human preference. One of the identified biases is language bias, which indicates that the decision of LLM-as-a-judge can differ based on the language of the judged texts. In this paper, we study two types of language bias in pairwise LLM-as-a-judge: (1) performance disparity between languages when the judge is prompted to compare options from the same language, and (2) bias towards options written in major languages when the judge is prompted to compare options of two different languages. We find that for same-language judging, there exist significant performance disparities across language families, with European languages consistently outperforming African languages, and this bias is more pronounced in culturally-related subjects. For inter-language judging, we observe that most models favor English answers, and that this preference is influenced more by answer language than question language. Finally, we investigate whether language bias is in fact caused by low-perplexity bias, a previously identified bias of LLM-as-a-judge, and we find that while perplexity is slightly correlated with language bias, language bias cannot be fully explained by perplexity only. |
| title | Fairness or Fluency? An Investigation into Language Bias of Pairwise LLM-as-a-Judge |
| topic | Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.13649 |