Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: MagLim++ Lens Sample Selection and Measurements of Galaxy Clustering

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Weaverdyck, N., Rodríguez-Monroy, M., Elvin-Poole, J., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Porredon, A., Avila, S., Lee, S., Riquelme, W., Tabbutt, M., Huterer, D., Prat, J., De Vicente, J., Mena-Fernández, J., Crocce, M., Sánchez, C., Bernstein, G. M., Henning, E., Cawthon, R., Ross, A. J., Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Allam, S. S., Alves, O., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Bacon, D., Bechtol, K., Bertin, E., Blazek, J., Bocquet, S., Brooks, D., Camilleri, R., Rosell, A. Carnero, Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Choi, A., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. da Silva, Davis, T. M., Diehl, H. T., Doux, C., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eifler, T., Everett, S., Evrard, A., Flaugher, B., García-Bellido, J., Gatti, M., Gaztañaga, E., Giannini, G., Gruen, D., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., Jain, B., Kacprzak, T., Kuehn, K., Lahav, O., Marshall, J. L., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Mohr, J. J., Muir, J., Myles, J., Nichol, R., Ogando, R. L. C., Palmese, A., Paterno, M., Percival, W. J., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Rosenfeld, R., Rykoff, E., Samuroff, S., Sanchez, E., Cid, D. Sanchez, Sheldon, E., Sherman, N., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Gregory, T., Thomas, D., To, C., Tucker, D. L., Vikram, V., Yamamoto, M., Yanny, B.
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866914268562063360
author Weaverdyck, N.
Rodríguez-Monroy, M.
Elvin-Poole, J.
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.
Porredon, A.
Avila, S.
Lee, S.
Riquelme, W.
Tabbutt, M.
Huterer, D.
Prat, J.
De Vicente, J.
Mena-Fernández, J.
Crocce, M.
Sánchez, C.
Bernstein, G. M.
Henning, E.
Cawthon, R.
Ross, A. J.
Abbott, T. M. C.
Aguena, M.
Allam, S. S.
Alves, O.
Andrade-Oliveira, F.
Bacon, D.
Bechtol, K.
Bertin, E.
Blazek, J.
Bocquet, S.
Brooks, D.
Camilleri, R.
Rosell, A. Carnero
Carretero, J.
Castander, F. J.
Choi, A.
da Costa, L. N.
Pereira, M. E. da Silva
Davis, T. M.
Diehl, H. T.
Doux, C.
Drlica-Wagner, A.
Eifler, T.
Everett, S.
Evrard, A.
Flaugher, B.
García-Bellido, J.
Gatti, M.
Gaztañaga, E.
Giannini, G.
Gruen, D.
Gutierrez, G.
Hinton, S. R.
Hollowood, D. L.
Honscheid, K.
Jain, B.
Kacprzak, T.
Kuehn, K.
Lahav, O.
Marshall, J. L.
Menanteau, F.
Miquel, R.
Mohr, J. J.
Muir, J.
Myles, J.
Nichol, R.
Ogando, R. L. C.
Palmese, A.
Paterno, M.
Percival, W. J.
Malagón, A. A. Plazas
Rosenfeld, R.
Rykoff, E.
Samuroff, S.
Sanchez, E.
Cid, D. Sanchez
Sheldon, E.
Sherman, N.
Smith, M.
Soares-Santos, M.
Suchyta, E.
Swanson, M. E. C.
Gregory, T.
Thomas, D.
To, C.
Tucker, D. L.
Vikram, V.
Yamamoto, M.
Yanny, B.
author_facet Weaverdyck, N.
Rodríguez-Monroy, M.
Elvin-Poole, J.
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.
Porredon, A.
Avila, S.
Lee, S.
Riquelme, W.
Tabbutt, M.
Huterer, D.
Prat, J.
De Vicente, J.
Mena-Fernández, J.
Crocce, M.
Sánchez, C.
Bernstein, G. M.
Henning, E.
Cawthon, R.
Ross, A. J.
Abbott, T. M. C.
Aguena, M.
Allam, S. S.
Alves, O.
Andrade-Oliveira, F.
Bacon, D.
Bechtol, K.
Bertin, E.
Blazek, J.
Bocquet, S.
Brooks, D.
Camilleri, R.
Rosell, A. Carnero
Carretero, J.
Castander, F. J.
Choi, A.
da Costa, L. N.
Pereira, M. E. da Silva
Davis, T. M.
Diehl, H. T.
Doux, C.
Drlica-Wagner, A.
Eifler, T.
Everett, S.
Evrard, A.
Flaugher, B.
García-Bellido, J.
Gatti, M.
Gaztañaga, E.
Giannini, G.
Gruen, D.
Gutierrez, G.
Hinton, S. R.
Hollowood, D. L.
Honscheid, K.
Jain, B.
Kacprzak, T.
Kuehn, K.
Lahav, O.
Marshall, J. L.
Menanteau, F.
Miquel, R.
Mohr, J. J.
Muir, J.
Myles, J.
Nichol, R.
Ogando, R. L. C.
Palmese, A.
Paterno, M.
Percival, W. J.
Malagón, A. A. Plazas
Rosenfeld, R.
Rykoff, E.
Samuroff, S.
Sanchez, E.
Cid, D. Sanchez
Sheldon, E.
Sherman, N.
Smith, M.
Soares-Santos, M.
Suchyta, E.
Swanson, M. E. C.
Gregory, T.
Thomas, D.
To, C.
Tucker, D. L.
Vikram, V.
Yamamoto, M.
Yanny, B.
contents Galaxy clustering is a sensitive probe of the expansion history and growth of structure of the universe, and key degeneracies can be broken by combining these data with measurements of cosmic shear and galaxy-galaxy lensing (a so-called 3$\times$2pt analysis). The largest and least biased statistical samples of galaxies for use in clustering analyses can be collected photometrically through large imaging surveys. However, selecting clean photometric subsamples for cosmology are crucial for avoiding contamination that can bias cosmological constraints. Here we present the MagLim++ galaxy sample, selected to optimize for cosmological constraining power and incorporating an array of novel quality cuts to identify and remove residual contamination. This sample comes from the full six years of observations from the Dark Energy Survey. We present measurements of the two-point angular clustering ($w(θ)$) of 9,186,205 galaxies distributed over 4031 sq. degrees and in six tomographic redshift bins centered at $\bar{z}\approx$ [0.31, 0.44, 0.62, 0.78, 0.90, 1.01]. These measurements are used as part of the 3$\times$2pt and other DES Y6 legacy cosmological analyses in companion works. We describe the battery of null tests and mitigation schemes implemented to address observational, astrophysical, and methodological systematics in the analysis. The resulting $w(θ)$ measurements have a S/N = 149 (90.2 for linear scales only), which we use to place galaxy-clustering-only constraints on the matter density of the Universe, $Ω_m=0.311^{+0.023}_{-0.035}$, and amplitude of galaxy clustering in each redshift bin, $b_iσ_8=[1.16^{+0.04}_{-0.06},\ 1.40^{+0.04}_{-0.06},\ 1.57^{+0.04}_{-0.06},\ 1.59^{+0.04}_{-0.05},\ 1.50^{+0.04}_{-0.05},\ 1.74^{+0.06}_{-0.08}]$.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2601_14484
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: MagLim++ Lens Sample Selection and Measurements of Galaxy Clustering
Weaverdyck, N.
Rodríguez-Monroy, M.
Elvin-Poole, J.
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.
Porredon, A.
Avila, S.
Lee, S.
Riquelme, W.
Tabbutt, M.
Huterer, D.
Prat, J.
De Vicente, J.
Mena-Fernández, J.
Crocce, M.
Sánchez, C.
Bernstein, G. M.
Henning, E.
Cawthon, R.
Ross, A. J.
Abbott, T. M. C.
Aguena, M.
Allam, S. S.
Alves, O.
Andrade-Oliveira, F.
Bacon, D.
Bechtol, K.
Bertin, E.
Blazek, J.
Bocquet, S.
Brooks, D.
Camilleri, R.
Rosell, A. Carnero
Carretero, J.
Castander, F. J.
Choi, A.
da Costa, L. N.
Pereira, M. E. da Silva
Davis, T. M.
Diehl, H. T.
Doux, C.
Drlica-Wagner, A.
Eifler, T.
Everett, S.
Evrard, A.
Flaugher, B.
García-Bellido, J.
Gatti, M.
Gaztañaga, E.
Giannini, G.
Gruen, D.
Gutierrez, G.
Hinton, S. R.
Hollowood, D. L.
Honscheid, K.
Jain, B.
Kacprzak, T.
Kuehn, K.
Lahav, O.
Marshall, J. L.
Menanteau, F.
Miquel, R.
Mohr, J. J.
Muir, J.
Myles, J.
Nichol, R.
Ogando, R. L. C.
Palmese, A.
Paterno, M.
Percival, W. J.
Malagón, A. A. Plazas
Rosenfeld, R.
Rykoff, E.
Samuroff, S.
Sanchez, E.
Cid, D. Sanchez
Sheldon, E.
Sherman, N.
Smith, M.
Soares-Santos, M.
Suchyta, E.
Swanson, M. E. C.
Gregory, T.
Thomas, D.
To, C.
Tucker, D. L.
Vikram, V.
Yamamoto, M.
Yanny, B.
Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Galaxy clustering is a sensitive probe of the expansion history and growth of structure of the universe, and key degeneracies can be broken by combining these data with measurements of cosmic shear and galaxy-galaxy lensing (a so-called 3$\times$2pt analysis). The largest and least biased statistical samples of galaxies for use in clustering analyses can be collected photometrically through large imaging surveys. However, selecting clean photometric subsamples for cosmology are crucial for avoiding contamination that can bias cosmological constraints. Here we present the MagLim++ galaxy sample, selected to optimize for cosmological constraining power and incorporating an array of novel quality cuts to identify and remove residual contamination. This sample comes from the full six years of observations from the Dark Energy Survey. We present measurements of the two-point angular clustering ($w(θ)$) of 9,186,205 galaxies distributed over 4031 sq. degrees and in six tomographic redshift bins centered at $\bar{z}\approx$ [0.31, 0.44, 0.62, 0.78, 0.90, 1.01]. These measurements are used as part of the 3$\times$2pt and other DES Y6 legacy cosmological analyses in companion works. We describe the battery of null tests and mitigation schemes implemented to address observational, astrophysical, and methodological systematics in the analysis. The resulting $w(θ)$ measurements have a S/N = 149 (90.2 for linear scales only), which we use to place galaxy-clustering-only constraints on the matter density of the Universe, $Ω_m=0.311^{+0.023}_{-0.035}$, and amplitude of galaxy clustering in each redshift bin, $b_iσ_8=[1.16^{+0.04}_{-0.06},\ 1.40^{+0.04}_{-0.06},\ 1.57^{+0.04}_{-0.06},\ 1.59^{+0.04}_{-0.05},\ 1.50^{+0.04}_{-0.05},\ 1.74^{+0.06}_{-0.08}]$.
title Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: MagLim++ Lens Sample Selection and Measurements of Galaxy Clustering
topic Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.14484