Covariant interpretation of proper infall times in Kerr spacetime

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pasten, Erick, Alvarez, Claudia, Cruz, Norman
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866910212675338240
author Pasten, Erick
Alvarez, Claudia
Cruz, Norman
author_facet Pasten, Erick
Alvarez, Claudia
Cruz, Norman
contents We investigate proper infall times in the Schwarzschild and Kerr spacetimes from a covariant perspective, focusing on the role of black--hole rotation in the focusing properties of timelike geodesic congruences.To perform a geometrically consistent comparison between rotating and non--rotating black holes, we analyse infall trajectories between surfaces of equal circumferential radius in the equatorial plane. Using equatorial timelike geodesics in the test--particle limit, we compute and compare the corresponding proper infall times for different values of the specific energy $E$, specific angular momentum $L$, and black--hole spin parameter $a$. Within the equal circumferential-radius prescription adopted here, we show that Kerr angular momentum $a$ can produce longer or shorter integrated proper infall times relative to the Schwarzschild case, depending on the orbital configuration and energy regime considered. We then interpret these results within the covariant $1+3$ formalism of general relativity, in terms of the expansion, shear, and Raychaudhuri evolution of timelike congruences. Our analysis shows that the Kerr--Schwarzschild differences in proper infall times are encoded in the corresponding Raychaudhuri time integrand, which reflects a competition between the radial evolution of the expansion and the nonlinear focusing contribution driven by expansion and shear. Black--hole rotation modifies both effects in a systematic way, leading to distinct behaviours for prograde and retrograde infall configurations.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2601_14664
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Covariant interpretation of proper infall times in Kerr spacetime
Pasten, Erick
Alvarez, Claudia
Cruz, Norman
General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Mathematical Physics
We investigate proper infall times in the Schwarzschild and Kerr spacetimes from a covariant perspective, focusing on the role of black--hole rotation in the focusing properties of timelike geodesic congruences.To perform a geometrically consistent comparison between rotating and non--rotating black holes, we analyse infall trajectories between surfaces of equal circumferential radius in the equatorial plane. Using equatorial timelike geodesics in the test--particle limit, we compute and compare the corresponding proper infall times for different values of the specific energy $E$, specific angular momentum $L$, and black--hole spin parameter $a$. Within the equal circumferential-radius prescription adopted here, we show that Kerr angular momentum $a$ can produce longer or shorter integrated proper infall times relative to the Schwarzschild case, depending on the orbital configuration and energy regime considered. We then interpret these results within the covariant $1+3$ formalism of general relativity, in terms of the expansion, shear, and Raychaudhuri evolution of timelike congruences. Our analysis shows that the Kerr--Schwarzschild differences in proper infall times are encoded in the corresponding Raychaudhuri time integrand, which reflects a competition between the radial evolution of the expansion and the nonlinear focusing contribution driven by expansion and shear. Black--hole rotation modifies both effects in a systematic way, leading to distinct behaviours for prograde and retrograde infall configurations.
title Covariant interpretation of proper infall times in Kerr spacetime
topic General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Mathematical Physics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.14664