Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walwyn, Rebecca EA, Bailey, Rosemary A, Singh, Arpan, Corrigan, Neil, Gilmour, Steven G
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.16318
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866914300253175808
author Walwyn, Rebecca EA
Bailey, Rosemary A
Singh, Arpan
Corrigan, Neil
Gilmour, Steven G
author_facet Walwyn, Rebecca EA
Bailey, Rosemary A
Singh, Arpan
Corrigan, Neil
Gilmour, Steven G
contents It is recognised that treatment-related clustering should be allowed for in the sample size and analyses of individually-randomised parallel-group trials that evaluate therapist-delivered interventions such as psychotherapy. Here, interventions are a treatment factor, but therapists are not. If the aim of a trial is to separate effects of therapists from those of interventions, we propose that interventions and therapists should be regarded as two potentially interacting treatment factors (one fixed, one random) with a factorial structure. We consider the specific design where each therapist delivers each intervention (crossed therapist-intervention design), and the resulting therapist-intervention combinations are randomised to patients. We adopt a classical Design of Experiments (DoE) approach to propose a family of orthogonal factorial designs and their associated data analyses, which allow for therapist learning and centre too. We set out the associated data analyses using ANOVA and regression and report the results of a small simulation study conducted to explore the performance of the proposed randomisation methods in estimating the intervention effect and its standard error, the between-therapist variance and the between-therapist variance in the intervention effect. We conclude that more purposeful trial design has the potential to lead to better evidence on a range of complex interventions and outline areas for further methodological research.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2601_16318
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Orthogonal factorial designs for trials of therapist-delivered interventions: Randomising intervention-therapist combinations to patients
Walwyn, Rebecca EA
Bailey, Rosemary A
Singh, Arpan
Corrigan, Neil
Gilmour, Steven G
Methodology
It is recognised that treatment-related clustering should be allowed for in the sample size and analyses of individually-randomised parallel-group trials that evaluate therapist-delivered interventions such as psychotherapy. Here, interventions are a treatment factor, but therapists are not. If the aim of a trial is to separate effects of therapists from those of interventions, we propose that interventions and therapists should be regarded as two potentially interacting treatment factors (one fixed, one random) with a factorial structure. We consider the specific design where each therapist delivers each intervention (crossed therapist-intervention design), and the resulting therapist-intervention combinations are randomised to patients. We adopt a classical Design of Experiments (DoE) approach to propose a family of orthogonal factorial designs and their associated data analyses, which allow for therapist learning and centre too. We set out the associated data analyses using ANOVA and regression and report the results of a small simulation study conducted to explore the performance of the proposed randomisation methods in estimating the intervention effect and its standard error, the between-therapist variance and the between-therapist variance in the intervention effect. We conclude that more purposeful trial design has the potential to lead to better evidence on a range of complex interventions and outline areas for further methodological research.
title Orthogonal factorial designs for trials of therapist-delivered interventions: Randomising intervention-therapist combinations to patients
topic Methodology
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.16318