Big Deal cancellations and scholarly publishing: Insights from faculty and graduate student interviews

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Hare, Madelaine, Mongeon, Philippe, Cassady, Samuel, Johnson, Catherine A.
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2026
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866912845120143360
author Hare, Madelaine
Mongeon, Philippe
Cassady, Samuel
Johnson, Catherine A.
author_facet Hare, Madelaine
Mongeon, Philippe
Cassady, Samuel
Johnson, Catherine A.
contents Big Deal cancellations are increasingly undertaken by academic librarians faced with rising subscription costs and shrinking collections budgets. While past research has focused on librarians' decision-making processes and communication strategies, this study aims to understand the perspectives and experiences of faculty and graduate students with Big Deal cancellations through interviews at three medium-sized Canadian institutions. It considers cancellations as a collaborative process of information exchange, rather than a top-down process. This study's findings can inform how and why cancellation projects can be undertaken with enhanced understandings of their lived realities of Big Deals and the current state of scholarly publishing. This study has been accepted by College and Research Libraries and will be published in July 2026.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2601_17033
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Big Deal cancellations and scholarly publishing: Insights from faculty and graduate student interviews
Hare, Madelaine
Mongeon, Philippe
Cassady, Samuel
Johnson, Catherine A.
Digital Libraries
Big Deal cancellations are increasingly undertaken by academic librarians faced with rising subscription costs and shrinking collections budgets. While past research has focused on librarians' decision-making processes and communication strategies, this study aims to understand the perspectives and experiences of faculty and graduate students with Big Deal cancellations through interviews at three medium-sized Canadian institutions. It considers cancellations as a collaborative process of information exchange, rather than a top-down process. This study's findings can inform how and why cancellation projects can be undertaken with enhanced understandings of their lived realities of Big Deals and the current state of scholarly publishing. This study has been accepted by College and Research Libraries and will be published in July 2026.
title Big Deal cancellations and scholarly publishing: Insights from faculty and graduate student interviews
topic Digital Libraries
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.17033