Cover Image

Deferred Acceptance Algorithm Improves Peer Review Process

Fuente: arXiv

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Bartneck, Christoph, Watt, Richard, Borde, Etienne, Klinpibul, Pattara
Format:	Preprint
Published:	2026
Subjects:	Digital Libraries
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

On The Peer Review Reports: Does Size Matter?
by: Maddi, Abdelghani, et al.
Published: (2024)

R-Index: A Metric for Assessing Researcher Contributions to Peer Review
by: Malekzadeh, Milad
Published: (2024)

ML Researchers Support Openness in Peer Review But Are Concerned About Resubmission Bias
by: Rao, Vishisht, et al.
Published: (2025)

Can Large Language Models Evaluate Grant Proposal Quality? Revisiting the Wennerås and Wold Peer Review Data
by: Sandström, Ulf, et al.
Published: (2026)

Peer Reviews of Peer Reviews: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Other Experiments
by: Goldberg, Alexander, et al.
Published: (2023)

Trends in Practical Student Peer-review
by: Purchase, Helen C., et al.
Published: (2024)

A Randomized Controlled Trial on Anonymizing Reviewers to Each Other in Peer Review Discussions
by: Rastogi, Charvi, et al.
Published: (2024)

ARA: Agentic Reproducibility Assessment For Scalable Support Of Scientific Peer-Review
by: Riehl, Kevin, et al.
Published: (2026)

A Formalization of the Ionescu-Tulcea Theorem in Mathlib
by: Marion, Etienne
Published: (2025)

Detecting LLM-Generated Peer Reviews
by: Rao, Vishisht, et al.
Published: (2025)

Gender and Discipline Shape Length, Content and Tone of Grant Peer Review Reports
by: Müller, Stefan, et al.
Published: (2025)

Causal Effect of Group Diversity on Redundancy and Coverage in Peer-Reviewing
by: Goyal, Navita, et al.
Published: (2024)

Identity Theft in AI Conference Peer Review
by: Shah, Nihar B., et al.
Published: (2025)

Evaluating the Predictive Capacity of ChatGPT for Academic Peer Review Outcomes Across Multiple Platforms
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2024)

Commitment Checklist: Auditing Author Commitments in Peer Review
by: Chen, Chung-Chi, et al.
Published: (2026)

Automated Peer Reviewing in Paper SEA: Standardization, Evaluation, and Analysis
by: Yu, Jianxiang, et al.
Published: (2024)

The IJCNN 2025 Review Process
by: Scarpiniti, Michele, et al.
Published: (2026)

Compound Deception in Elite Peer Review: A Failure Mode Taxonomy of 100 Fabricated Citations at NeurIPS 2025
by: Ansari, Samar
Published: (2026)

Rejoinder: The ICML 2023 Ranking Experiment: Examining Author Self-Assessment in ML/AI Peer Review
by: Su, Buxin, et al.
Published: (2026)

Pre-review to Peer review: Pitfalls of Automating Reviews using Large Language Models
by: Akella, Akhil Pandey, et al.
Published: (2025)

Using General Large Language Models to Classify Mathematical Documents
by: Ion, Patrick D. F., et al.
Published: (2024)

Enhancing Peer Review in Astronomy: A Machine Learning and Optimization Approach to Reviewer Assignments for ALMA
by: Carpenter, John M., et al.
Published: (2024)

Open Access Improves the Dissemination of Science: Insights from Wikipedia
by: Yang, Puyu, et al.
Published: (2023)

Institutional cooperations in Austrian research: An analysis of shared researchers
by: Schlager, Christoph, et al.
Published: (2025)

Interactive Evidence Maps for Visualizing and Understanding Systematic Reviews
by: Mallavarapu, Aditi, et al.
Published: (2026)

Developing Application Profiles for Enhancing Data and Workflows in Cultural Heritage Digitisation Processes
by: Barzaghi, Sebastian, et al.
Published: (2024)

Large Language Models for Departmental Expert Review Quality Scores
by: Langfeldt, Liv, et al.
Published: (2026)

Application of Module to Coding Theory: A Systematic Literature Review
by: Faldiyan, Muhammad, et al.
Published: (2024)

Improving metadata flows -- The simultaneous use of multiple metadata schemas at disciplinary research data repositories
by: Strecker, Dorothea
Published: (2026)

SWARM-SLR AIssistant: A Unified Framework for Scalable Systematic Literature Review Automation
by: Wittenborg, Tim, et al.
Published: (2026)

Who Are Tweeting About Academic Publications? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Altmetric Studies
by: Maleki, Ashraf, et al.
Published: (2023)

DecentPeeR: A Self-Incentivised & Inclusive Decentralized Peer Review System
by: Gruendler, Johannes, et al.
Published: (2024)

NFDIcore 2.0: A BFO-Compliant Ontology for Multi-Domain Research Infrastructures
by: Bruns, Oleksandra, et al.
Published: (2024)

Position: The Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Community Should Adopt a More Transparent and Regulated Peer Review Process
by: Yang, Jing
Published: (2025)

How to Find Fantastic AI Papers: Self-Rankings as a Powerful Predictor of Scientific Impact Beyond Peer Review
by: Su, Buxin, et al.
Published: (2025)

Improving overlay maps of science: combining overview and detail
by: Sjögårde, Peter
Published: (2021)

On the Alignment of Post-Publication Reviews & Bibliometric and Altmetric Impact -- A Case Study on Expert Statements from the Science Media Center Germany
by: Tunger, Dirk, et al.
Published: (2025)

Paper Copilot: Tracking the Evolution of Peer Review in AI Conferences
by: Yang, Jing, et al.
Published: (2025)

Toward Living Narrative Reviews: An Empirical Study of the Processes and Challenges in Updating Survey Articles in Computing Research
by: Fok, Raymond, et al.
Published: (2025)

Cost for research -- how cost data of research can be included in open metadata to be reused and evaluated
by: Bartlewski, Julia, et al.
Published: (2025)