Cover Image

Authority Signals in AI Cited Health Sources: A Framework for Evaluating Source Credibility in ChatGPT Responses

Fuente: arXiv

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Jacques, Erin, Datuowei, Erela, Jones II, Vincent, Basch, Corey, Vanderpool, Celeta, Udeozo, Nkechi, Chapa, Griselda
Format:	Preprint
Published:	2026
Subjects:	Digital Libraries Artificial Intelligence
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Authority Signals in Claude AI Health Citations: A Descriptive Analysis Using the Authority Signals Framework
by: Jacques, Erin T., et al.
Published: (2026)

Can ChatGPT evaluate research quality?
by: Thelwall, Mike
Published: (2024)

Which stylistic features fool ChatGPT research evaluations?
by: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Published: (2026)

Estimating the quality of academic books from their descriptions with ChatGPT
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2025)

ChatGPT "contamination": estimating the prevalence of LLMs in the scholarly literature
by: Gray, Andrew
Published: (2024)

A Global South Strategy for Evaluating Research Value with ChatGPT
by: Nunkoo, Robin, et al.
Published: (2025)

Research evaluation with ChatGPT: Is it age, country, length, or field biased?
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2024)

Implicit and Explicit Research Quality Score Probabilities from ChatGPT
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2025)

Evaluating the quality of published medical research with ChatGPT
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2024)

Can ChatGPT evaluate research environments? Evidence from REF2021
by: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Published: (2025)

Journal Quality Factors from ChatGPT: More meaningful than Impact Factors?
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2024)

FAIR GPT: A virtual consultant for research data management in ChatGPT
by: Shigapov, Renat, et al.
Published: (2024)

Is ChatGPT Transforming Academics' Writing Style?
by: Geng, Mingmeng, et al.
Published: (2024)

In which fields do ChatGPT scores align better than citations with research quality?
by: Thelwall, Mike
Published: (2025)

Delving into the Utilisation of ChatGPT in Scientific Publications in Astronomy
by: Astarita, Simone, et al.
Published: (2024)

In which fields can ChatGPT detect journal article quality? An evaluation of REF2021 results
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2024)

Assessing the societal influence of academic research with ChatGPT: Impact case study evaluations
by: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Published: (2024)

Can ChatGPT be a good follower of academic paradigms? Research quality evaluations in conflicting areas of sociology
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2025)

Where there's a will there's a way: ChatGPT is used more for science in countries where it is prohibited
by: Bao, Honglin, et al.
Published: (2024)

Evaluating the Predictive Capacity of ChatGPT for Academic Peer Review Outcomes Across Multiple Platforms
by: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Published: (2024)

An Experiment with the Use of ChatGPT for LCSH Subject Assignment on Electronic Theses and Dissertations
by: Chow, Eric H. C., et al.
Published: (2024)

How much are LLMs changing the language of academic papers after ChatGPT? A multi-database and full text analysis
by: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Published: (2025)

Evaluating LLM-Generated Informed Consent: FDA-Aligned Audit Framework for AYA CNS Cancer Clinical Trials
by: Basch, Corey, et al.
Published: (2026)

Evaluating LLM-Generated Informed Consent: FDA-Aligned Audit Framework for AYA CNS Cancer Clinical Trials
by: Basch, Corey, et al.
Published: (2026)

Evaluating Research Quality with Large Language Models: An Analysis of ChatGPT's Effectiveness with Different Settings and Inputs
by: Thelwall, Mike
Published: (2024)

Sentiment Analysis of Citations in Scientific Articles Using ChatGPT: Identifying Potential Biases and Conflicts of Interest
by: Hariri, Walid
Published: (2024)

Are ChatGPT and Other Similar Systems the Modern Lernaean Hydras of AI?
by: Ioannidis, Dimitrios, et al.
Published: (2023)

The Credibility Revolution in Political Science
by: Torreblanca, Carolina, et al.
Published: (2025)

Quantifying Similarity: Text-Mining Approaches to Evaluate ChatGPT and Google Bard Content in Relation to BioMedical Literature
by: Klimczak, Jakub, et al.
Published: (2024)

crate2bib: Citing Rust crates made easy
by: Pleyer, Jonas
Published: (2025)

Cited But Not Archived: Analyzing the Status of Code References in Scholarly Articles
by: Escamilla, Emily, et al.
Published: (2024)

CiteAudit: You Cited It, But Did You Read It? A Benchmark for Verifying Scientific References in the LLM Era
by: Shi, Kaiwen, et al.
Published: (2026)

ChatGPT und andere »Quatschmaschinen«
Published: (2024)

From ChatGPT, DALL-E 3 to Sora: How has Generative AI Changed Digital Humanities Research and Services?
by: Liu, Jiangfeng, et al.
Published: (2024)

CiteGuard: Faithful Citation Attribution for LLMs via Retrieval-Augmented Validation
by: Choi, Yee Man, et al.
Published: (2025)

How permanent are metadata for research data? Understanding changes in DataCite metadata
by: Strecker, Dorothea
Published: (2024)

A Bibliometric Analysis of Highly Cited Artificial Intelligence Publications in Science Citation Index Expanded
by: Ho, Yuh-Shan, et al.
Published: (2024)

Self-Citations in Academic Excellence: Analysis of the Top 1% Highly Cited India-Affiliated Research Papers
by: Sharma, Kiran, et al.
Published: (2025)

Assessing the Credibility of ChatGPT on Temporomandibular Disorders
by: Hilal Yilanci, et al.
Published: (2026)

The Importance of the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) in Enhancing the Credibility of Scientific Research: An Analytical Data Study
by: Alalaq, Ahmed Shaker
Published: (2025)