Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.18297 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- Electrochemical devices (batteries, fuel cells, and electrolyzers) are in full development, driven by the green energy transition. Their real-time control requires ms predictions in order to take critical decisions during fast transients or faults. The physics behind include coupled multi-physics phenomena that conventional finite element methods cannot solve so fast with the current CPU technology. This paper evaluates the potential of physics-informed machine learning represented by three frameworks: \ac{pinn}, \ac{pideeponet}, and \ac{pino} by evaluating their training effort, inference speed, and extrapolation capacity. Our analysis reveals valuable performance trade-offs. \acp{pinn} offer simplicity for fixed problem instances but require retraining for parameter changes. \ac{pideeponet} enables operator learning across varying conditions with mesh-free geometric flexibility. \ac{pino} delivers superior performance on regular grids, with the strongest extrapolation capabilities due to spectral derivative computation and resolution invariance. \ac{pideeponet} is particularly suited for irregular, unstructured geometries (e.g., porous electrodes or complex flow fields), while \ac{pino} works best for layered, structured-grid problems (e.g., transport across stacked electrochemical layers) requiring fast inference. Possible future applications include real-time lithium concentration prediction for safe fast-charging and micro short circuit detection, water management in fuel cells, and optimal power management in electrolyzers under intermittent renewable inputs. These findings establish physics-informed operator learning as a transformative approach for next-generation electrochemical device controller technology.