Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Cannataci, Joe, Fehrensen, Benjamin, Gütschow, Mikolai, Kesim, Özgür, Lucke, Bernd
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2026
Soggetti:
Accesso online:https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.18644
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866915756370821120
author Cannataci, Joe
Fehrensen, Benjamin
Gütschow, Mikolai
Kesim, Özgür
Lucke, Bernd
author_facet Cannataci, Joe
Fehrensen, Benjamin
Gütschow, Mikolai
Kesim, Özgür
Lucke, Bernd
contents The European Central Bank (ECB) is working on the "digital euro", an envisioned retail central bank digital currency for the Euro area. In this article, we take a closer look at the "digital euro FAQ", which provides answers to 26 frequently asked questions about the digital euro, and other published documents by the ECB on the topic. We question the provided answers based on our analysis of the current design in terms of privacy, technical feasibility, risks, costs and utility. In particular, we discuss the following key findings: (KF1) Central monitoring of all online digital euro transactions by the ECB threatens privacy even more than contemporary digital payment methods with segregated account databases. (KF2) The ECB's envisioned concept of a secure offline version of the digital euro offering full anonymity is in strong conflict with the actual history of hardware security breaches and mathematical evidence against it. (KF3) The legal and financial liabilities for the various parties involved remain unclear. (KF4) The design lacks well-specified economic incentives for operators as well as a discussion of its economic impact on merchants. (KF5) The ECB fails to identify tangible benefits the digital euro would create for society, in particular given that the online component of the proposed infrastructure mainly duplicates existing payment systems. (KF6) The design process has been exclusionary, with critical decisions being set in stone before public consultations. Alternative and open design ideas have not even been discussed by the ECB.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2601_18644
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Digital Euro: Frequently Asked Questions Revisited
Cannataci, Joe
Fehrensen, Benjamin
Gütschow, Mikolai
Kesim, Özgür
Lucke, Bernd
Computers and Society
General Economics
Economics
The European Central Bank (ECB) is working on the "digital euro", an envisioned retail central bank digital currency for the Euro area. In this article, we take a closer look at the "digital euro FAQ", which provides answers to 26 frequently asked questions about the digital euro, and other published documents by the ECB on the topic. We question the provided answers based on our analysis of the current design in terms of privacy, technical feasibility, risks, costs and utility. In particular, we discuss the following key findings: (KF1) Central monitoring of all online digital euro transactions by the ECB threatens privacy even more than contemporary digital payment methods with segregated account databases. (KF2) The ECB's envisioned concept of a secure offline version of the digital euro offering full anonymity is in strong conflict with the actual history of hardware security breaches and mathematical evidence against it. (KF3) The legal and financial liabilities for the various parties involved remain unclear. (KF4) The design lacks well-specified economic incentives for operators as well as a discussion of its economic impact on merchants. (KF5) The ECB fails to identify tangible benefits the digital euro would create for society, in particular given that the online component of the proposed infrastructure mainly duplicates existing payment systems. (KF6) The design process has been exclusionary, with critical decisions being set in stone before public consultations. Alternative and open design ideas have not even been discussed by the ECB.
title Digital Euro: Frequently Asked Questions Revisited
topic Computers and Society
General Economics
Economics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.18644