Copertina

Who Said CVE? How Vulnerability Identifiers Are Mentioned by Humans, Bots, and Agents in Pull Requests

Fuente: arXiv

Salvato in:

Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali:	Rooijendijk, Pien, Treude, Christoph, Wessel, Mairieli
Natura:	Preprint
Pubblicazione:	2026
Soggetti:	Software Engineering
Accesso online:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Aggiungi Tag Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!

Documenti analoghi

GitHub Actions: The Impact on the Pull Request Process
di: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2022)

Quality Gatekeepers: Investigating the Effects ofCode Review Bots on Pull Request Activities
di: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2021)

How Do Software Developers Use GitHub Actions to Automate Their Workflows?
di: Kinsman, Timothy, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2021)

Guidelines for Developing Bots for GitHub
di: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2022)

Generative AI for Pull Request Descriptions: Adoption, Impact, and Developer Interventions
di: Xiao, Tao, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Don't Disturb Me: Challenges of Interacting with SoftwareBots on Open Source Software Projects
di: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2021)

Humans Integrate, Agents Fix: How Agent-Authored Pull Requests Are Referenced in Practice
di: Khemissi, Islem, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Bridging HCI and AI Research for the Evaluation of Conversational SE Assistants
di: Richards, Jonan, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

What You Need is What You Get: Theory of Mind for an LLM-Based Code Understanding Assistant
di: Richards, Jonan, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Bot-Driven Development: From Simple Automation to Autonomous Software Development Bots
di: Treude, Christoph, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

On the Footprints of Reviewer Bots Feedback on Agentic Pull Requests in OSS GitHub Repositories
di: Fatima, Syeda Kaneez, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

The Competence Crisis: A Design Fiction on AI-Assisted Research in Software Engineering
di: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Human-Agent versus Human Pull Requests: A Testing-Focused Characterization and Comparison
di: Milanese, Roberto, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

The Present and Future of Bots in Software Engineering
di: Shihab, Emad, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2022)

Do Autonomous Agents Contribute Test Code? A Study of Tests in Agentic Pull Requests
di: Haque, Sabrina, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

These Aren't the Reviews You're Looking For How Humans Review AI-Generated Pull Requests
di: Duma, Kacper, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Collaborator or Assistant? How AI Coding Agents Partition Work Across Pull Request Lifecycles
di: Jo, Young, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Let's Make Every Pull Request Meaningful: An Empirical Analysis of Developer and Agentic Pull Requests
di: Yoshioka, Haruhiko, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

A Study of Library Usage in Agent-Authored Pull Requests
di: Twist, Lukas, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

"My GitHub Sponsors profile is live!" Investigating the Impact of Twitter/X Mentions on GitHub Sponsors
di: Fan, Youmei, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

How Do Developers Use Code Suggestions in Pull Request Reviews?
di: Bouraffa, Abir, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

The Value of Effective Pull Request Description
di: Pirouzkhah, Shirin, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

How AI Coding Agents Communicate: A Study of Pull Request Description Characteristics and Human Review Responses
di: Watanabe, Kan, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

An Investigation on How AI-Generated Responses Affect SoftwareEngineering Surveys
di: Santos, Ronnie de Souza, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

An Empirical Study of the Evolution of GitHub Actions Workflows
di: Mazrae, Pooya Rostami, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Tracing Vulnerabilities in Maven: A Study of CVE lifecycles and Dependency Networks
di: Yang-Smith, Corey, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Comparing AI Coding Agents: A Task-Stratified Analysis of Pull Request Acceptance
di: Pinna, Giovanni, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Insights into Security-Related AI-Generated Pull Requests
di: Rabbi, Md Fazle, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

The Impact of Documentation on Test Engagement in Pull Requests in OSS
di: Amore, Teal, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Empirical Analysis of Pull Requests for Google Summer of Code
di: Popoola, Saheed
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Who Writes the Docs in SE 3.0? Agent vs. Human Documentation Pull Requests
di: Yamasaki, Kazuma, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

From Diverse Origins to a DEI Crisis: The Pushback Against Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Software Engineering
di: Santos, Ronnie de Souza, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Accountable Agents in Software Engineering: An Analysis of Terms of Service and a Research Roadmap
di: Treude, Christoph
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Creative and Correct: Requesting Diverse Code Solutions from AI Foundation Models
di: Blyth, Scott, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

From Industry Claims to Empirical Reality: An Empirical Study of Code Review Agents in Pull Requests
di: Chowdhury, Kowshik, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

How Fair is Software Fairness Testing?
di: Barcomb, Ann, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Why Are Agentic Pull Requests Merged or Rejected? An Empirical Study
di: Peralta, Sien Reeve O., et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

The Quiet Contributions: Insights into AI-Generated Silent Pull Requests
di: Hasan, S M Mahedy, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

CVE Breadcrumbs: Tracking Vulnerabilities Through Versioned Apache Libraries
di: Garcia, Derek, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Code Change Characteristics and Description Alignment: A Comparative Study of Agentic versus Human Pull Requests
di: Pham, Dung, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)