Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Liu, Weicong, Yang, Zixuan, Zhao, Yibo, Li, Xiang |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.19637 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
PeerPrism: Peer Evaluation Expertise vs Review-writing AI
by: Sadeghian, Soroush, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Sadeghian, Soroush, et al.
Published: (2026)
AgentReview: Exploring Peer Review Dynamics with LLM Agents
by: Jin, Yiqiao, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Jin, Yiqiao, et al.
Published: (2024)
LLM Review: Enhancing Creative Writing via Blind Peer Review Feedback
by: Li, Weiyue, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Li, Weiyue, et al.
Published: (2026)
EchoReview: Learning Peer Review from the Echoes of Scientific Citations
by: Zhang, Yinuo, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Zhang, Yinuo, et al.
Published: (2026)
Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Future
by: Wu, Sihong, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Wu, Sihong, et al.
Published: (2026)
Identifying Aspects in Peer Reviews
by: Lu, Sheng, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Lu, Sheng, et al.
Published: (2025)
Retrieval, Reward, and Training Protocols: What Matters in Training Search Agents?
by: Zhao, Yibo, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Zhao, Yibo, et al.
Published: (2026)
Disparities in Peer Review Tone and the Role of Reviewer Anonymity
by: Sahakyan, Maria, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Sahakyan, Maria, et al.
Published: (2025)
Exploring the Nexus of Large Language Models and Legal Systems: A Short Survey
by: Qin, Weicong, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Qin, Weicong, et al.
Published: (2024)
DeepReviewer 2.0: A Traceable Agentic System for Auditable Scientific Peer Review
by: Weng, Yixuan, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Weng, Yixuan, et al.
Published: (2026)
Reviewing the Reviewer: Elevating Peer Review Quality through LLM-Guided Feedback
by: Purkayastha, Sukannya, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Purkayastha, Sukannya, et al.
Published: (2026)
ReviewScore: Misinformed Peer Review Detection with Large Language Models
by: Ryu, Hyun, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Ryu, Hyun, et al.
Published: (2025)
LazyReview A Dataset for Uncovering Lazy Thinking in NLP Peer Reviews
by: Purkayastha, Sukannya, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Purkayastha, Sukannya, et al.
Published: (2025)
Is Peer-Reviewing Worth the Effort?
by: Church, Kenneth, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Church, Kenneth, et al.
Published: (2024)
PiCO: Peer Review in LLMs based on the Consistency Optimization
by: Ning, Kun-Peng, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Ning, Kun-Peng, et al.
Published: (2024)
Large Language Models Penetration in Scholarly Writing and Peer Review
by: Zhou, Li, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Zhou, Li, et al.
Published: (2025)
Is Peer Review Really in Decline? Analyzing Review Quality across Venues and Time
by: Kuznetsov, Ilia, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Kuznetsov, Ilia, et al.
Published: (2026)
Modeling LLM Agent Reviewer Dynamics in Elo-Ranked Review System
by: Huang, Hsiang-Wei, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Huang, Hsiang-Wei, et al.
Published: (2026)
ReviewGuard: Enhancing Deficient Peer Review Detection via LLM-Driven Data Augmentation
by: Zhang, Haoxuan, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Zhang, Haoxuan, et al.
Published: (2025)
PRE: A Peer Review Based Large Language Model Evaluator
by: Chu, Zhumin, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Chu, Zhumin, et al.
Published: (2024)
PRAIB: Peer Review AI Benchmark of Behaviour of LLM-Assisted Reviewing
by: Żurawicki, Krzysztof, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Żurawicki, Krzysztof, et al.
Published: (2026)
Automated Peer Reviewing in Paper SEA: Standardization, Evaluation, and Analysis
by: Yu, Jianxiang, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Yu, Jianxiang, et al.
Published: (2024)
Multimodal Peer Review Simulation with Actionable To-Do Recommendations for Community-Aware Manuscript Revisions
by: Hong, Mengze, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Hong, Mengze, et al.
Published: (2025)
Peerispect: Claim Verification in Scientific Peer Reviews
by: Ghorbanpour, Ali, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Ghorbanpour, Ali, et al.
Published: (2026)
Timber: Training-free Instruct Model Refining with Base via Effective Rank
by: Wu, Taiqiang, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Wu, Taiqiang, et al.
Published: (2025)
When Reviews Disagree: Fine-Grained Contradiction Analysis in Scientific Peer Reviews
by: Kumar, Sandeep, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Kumar, Sandeep, et al.
Published: (2026)
TreeReview: A Dynamic Tree of Questions Framework for Deep and Efficient LLM-based Scientific Peer Review
by: Chang, Yuan, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Chang, Yuan, et al.
Published: (2025)
Agentar-Fin-R1: Enhancing Financial Intelligence through Domain Expertise, Training Efficiency, and Advanced Reasoning
by: Zheng, Yanjun, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Zheng, Yanjun, et al.
Published: (2025)
MMReview: A Multidisciplinary and Multimodal Benchmark for LLM-Based Peer Review Automation
by: Gao, Xian, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Gao, Xian, et al.
Published: (2025)
What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?
by: Kuznetsov, Ilia, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Kuznetsov, Ilia, et al.
Published: (2024)
Commitment Checklist: Auditing Author Commitments in Peer Review
by: Chen, Chung-Chi, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Chen, Chung-Chi, et al.
Published: (2026)
Auto-PRE: An Automatic and Cost-Efficient Peer-Review Framework for Language Generation Evaluation
by: Chen, Junjie, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Chen, Junjie, et al.
Published: (2024)
Decoupling Scores and Text: The Politeness Principle in Peer Review
by: Wen, Yingxuan
Published: (2026)
by: Wen, Yingxuan
Published: (2026)
Is Your Paper Being Reviewed by an LLM? Benchmarking AI Text Detection in Peer Review
by: Yu, Sungduk, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Yu, Sungduk, et al.
Published: (2025)
Is Your Paper Being Reviewed by an LLM? Investigating AI Text Detectability in Peer Review
by: Yu, Sungduk, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Yu, Sungduk, et al.
Published: (2024)
PeerQA: A Scientific Question Answering Dataset from Peer Reviews
by: Baumgärtner, Tim, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Baumgärtner, Tim, et al.
Published: (2025)
Aspect-Guided Multi-Level Perturbation Analysis of Large Language Models in Automated Peer Review
by: Li, Jiatao, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Li, Jiatao, et al.
Published: (2025)
PRISM: A Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Peer Reviewers
by: Loc, Ngoc Phan Phuoc, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Loc, Ngoc Phan Phuoc, et al.
Published: (2026)
Sem-Detect: Semantic Level Detection of AI Generated Peer-Reviews
by: Duarte, André V., et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Duarte, André V., et al.
Published: (2026)
STRICTA: Structured Reasoning in Critical Text Assessment for Peer Review and Beyond
by: Dycke, Nils, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Dycke, Nils, et al.
Published: (2024)
Similar Items
-
PeerPrism: Peer Evaluation Expertise vs Review-writing AI
by: Sadeghian, Soroush, et al.
Published: (2026) -
AgentReview: Exploring Peer Review Dynamics with LLM Agents
by: Jin, Yiqiao, et al.
Published: (2024) -
LLM Review: Enhancing Creative Writing via Blind Peer Review Feedback
by: Li, Weiyue, et al.
Published: (2026) -
EchoReview: Learning Peer Review from the Echoes of Scientific Citations
by: Zhang, Yinuo, et al.
Published: (2026) -
Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Future
by: Wu, Sihong, et al.
Published: (2026)