Cover Image

Beyond Bug Fixes: An Empirical Investigation of Post-Merge Code Quality Issues in Agent-Generated Pull Requests

Fuente: arXiv

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Cynthia, Shamse Tasnim, Muttakin, Al, Roy, Banani
Format:	Preprint
Published:	2026
Subjects:	Software Engineering
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

An Empirical Study on the Impact of Gender Diversity on Code Quality in AI Systems
by: Cynthia, Shamse Tasnim, et al.
Published: (2025)

Are We All Using Agents the Same Way? An Empirical Study of Core and Peripheral Developers Use of Coding Agents
by: Cynthia, Shamse Tasnim, et al.
Published: (2026)

Towards LLM-Powered Task-Aware Retrieval of Scientific Workflows for Galaxy
by: Cynthia, Shamse Tasnim, et al.
Published: (2025)

How Do Community Smells Influence Self-Admitted Technical Debt in Machine Learning Projects?
by: Cynthia, Shamse Tasnim, et al.
Published: (2025)

Why Are AI Agent Involved Pull Requests (Fix-Related) Remain Unmerged? An Empirical Study
by: Alam, Khairul, et al.
Published: (2026)

Identification and Optimization of Redundant Code Using Large Language Models
by: Cynthia, Shamse Tasnim
Published: (2025)

Gender Disparities in Contributions, Leadership, and Collaboration: An Exploratory Study on Software Systems Research
by: Cynthia, Shamse Tasnim, et al.
Published: (2024)

Analyzing GitHub Issues and Pull Requests in nf-core Pipelines: Insights into nf-core Pipeline Repositories
by: Alam, Khairul, et al.
Published: (2026)

Why Are Agentic Pull Requests Merged or Rejected? An Empirical Study
by: Peralta, Sien Reeve O., et al.
Published: (2026)

Utilizing Source Code Syntax Patterns to Detect Bug Inducing Commits using Machine Learning Models
by: Nadim, Md, et al.
Published: (2022)

Empirical Analysis of Pull Requests for Google Summer of Code
by: Popoola, Saheed
Published: (2024)

From Industry Claims to Empirical Reality: An Empirical Study of Code Review Agents in Pull Requests
by: Chowdhury, Kowshik, et al.
Published: (2026)

Quality Gatekeepers: Investigating the Effects ofCode Review Bots on Pull Request Activities
by: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Published: (2021)

On the Use of Agentic Coding: An Empirical Study of Pull Requests on GitHub
by: Watanabe, Miku, et al.
Published: (2025)

Let's Make Every Pull Request Meaningful: An Empirical Analysis of Developer and Agentic Pull Requests
by: Yoshioka, Haruhiko, et al.
Published: (2026)

What Drives Issue Resolution Speed? An Empirical Study of Scientific Workflow Systems on GitHub
by: Alam, Khairul, et al.
Published: (2025)

Humans Integrate, Agents Fix: How Agent-Authored Pull Requests Are Referenced in Practice
by: Khemissi, Islem, et al.
Published: (2026)

Where Do AI Coding Agents Fail? An Empirical Study of Failed Agentic Pull Requests in GitHub
by: Ehsani, Ramtin, et al.
Published: (2026)

The State of Open Science in Software Engineering Research: A Case Study of ICSE Artifacts
by: Muttakin, Al, et al.
Published: (2026)

An Empirical Investigation on the Challenges in Scientific Workflow Systems Development
by: Alam, Khairul, et al.
Published: (2024)

Evaluating the Impact of Data Cleaning on the Quality of Generated Pull Request Descriptions
by: Tire, Kutay, et al.
Published: (2025)

Improving Merge Pipeline Throughput in Continuous Integration via Pull Request Prioritization
by: Jungwirth, Maximilian, et al.
Published: (2025)

Comparing AI Coding Agents: A Task-Stratified Analysis of Pull Request Acceptance
by: Pinna, Giovanni, et al.
Published: (2026)

An Empirical Study on Developers Shared Conversations with ChatGPT in GitHub Pull Requests and Issues
by: Hao, Huizi, et al.
Published: (2024)

Analyzing Message-Code Inconsistency in AI Coding Agent-Authored Pull Requests
by: Gong, Jingzhi, et al.
Published: (2026)

Do Autonomous Agents Contribute Test Code? A Study of Tests in Agentic Pull Requests
by: Haque, Sabrina, et al.
Published: (2026)

Collaborator or Assistant? How AI Coding Agents Partition Work Across Pull Request Lifecycles
by: Jo, Young, et al.
Published: (2026)

Reproducibility of Issues Reported in Stack Overflow Questions: Challenges, Impact & Estimation
by: Mondal, Saikat, et al.
Published: (2024)

BeyondSWE: Can Current Code Agent Survive Beyond Single-Repo Bug Fixing?
by: Chen, Guoxin, et al.
Published: (2026)

A Study of Library Usage in Agent-Authored Pull Requests
by: Twist, Lukas, et al.
Published: (2025)

SelfHeal: Empirical Fix Pattern Analysis and Bug Repair in LLM Agents
by: Islam, Niful, et al.
Published: (2026)

How Do Developers Use Code Suggestions in Pull Request Reviews?
by: Bouraffa, Abir, et al.
Published: (2025)

Insights into Security-Related AI-Generated Pull Requests
by: Rabbi, Md Fazle, et al.
Published: (2026)

An Empirical Study on the Amount of Changes Required for Merge Request Acceptance
by: Kansab, Samah, et al.
Published: (2025)

Quality and Security Signals in AI-Generated Python Refactoring Pull Requests
by: Almukhtar, Mohamed, et al.
Published: (2026)

SWE-PRBench: Benchmarking AI Code Review Quality Against Pull Request Feedback
by: Kumar, Deepak
Published: (2026)

An Empirical Study on LLM-based Agents for Automated Bug Fixing
by: Meng, Xiangxin, et al.
Published: (2024)

The Value of Effective Pull Request Description
by: Pirouzkhah, Shirin, et al.
Published: (2026)

More Code, Less Reuse: Investigating Code Quality and Reviewer Sentiment towards AI-generated Pull Requests
by: Huang, Haoming, et al.
Published: (2026)

The Quiet Contributions: Insights into AI-Generated Silent Pull Requests
by: Hasan, S M Mahedy, et al.
Published: (2026)