Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.23112 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866918326555377664 |
|---|---|
| author | Yu, Cheng Engelmann, Severin Cao, Ruoxuan Ali, Dalia Papakyriakopoulos, Orestis |
| author_facet | Yu, Cheng Engelmann, Severin Cao, Ruoxuan Ali, Dalia Papakyriakopoulos, Orestis |
| contents | AI safety benchmarks are pivotal for safety in advanced AI systems; however, they have significant technical, epistemic, and sociotechnical shortcomings. We present a review of 210 safety benchmarks that maps out common challenges in safety benchmarking, documenting failures and limitations by drawing from engineering sciences and long-established theories of risk and safety. We argue that adhering to established risk management principles, mapping the space of what can(not) be measured, developing robust probabilistic metrics, and efficiently deploying measurement theory to connect benchmarking objectives with the world can significantly improve the validity and usefulness of AI safety benchmarks. The review provides a roadmap on how to improve AI safety benchmarking, and we illustrate the effectiveness of these recommendations through quantitative and qualitative evaluation. We also introduce a checklist that can help researchers and practitioners develop robust and epistemologically sound safety benchmarks. This study advances the science of benchmarking and helps practitioners deploy AI systems more responsibly. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2601_23112 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | How Should AI Safety Benchmarks Benchmark Safety? Yu, Cheng Engelmann, Severin Cao, Ruoxuan Ali, Dalia Papakyriakopoulos, Orestis Computers and Society AI safety benchmarks are pivotal for safety in advanced AI systems; however, they have significant technical, epistemic, and sociotechnical shortcomings. We present a review of 210 safety benchmarks that maps out common challenges in safety benchmarking, documenting failures and limitations by drawing from engineering sciences and long-established theories of risk and safety. We argue that adhering to established risk management principles, mapping the space of what can(not) be measured, developing robust probabilistic metrics, and efficiently deploying measurement theory to connect benchmarking objectives with the world can significantly improve the validity and usefulness of AI safety benchmarks. The review provides a roadmap on how to improve AI safety benchmarking, and we illustrate the effectiveness of these recommendations through quantitative and qualitative evaluation. We also introduce a checklist that can help researchers and practitioners develop robust and epistemologically sound safety benchmarks. This study advances the science of benchmarking and helps practitioners deploy AI systems more responsibly. |
| title | How Should AI Safety Benchmarks Benchmark Safety? |
| topic | Computers and Society |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.23112 |