_version_ 1866915971399155712
author Shah, Nigam H.
Ambers, Nerissa
Pandya, Abby
Keyes, Timothy
Banda, Juan M.
Nallan, Srikar
Lugtu, Carlene
Trotsyuk, Artem A.
Bedi, Suhana
Unell, Alyssa
Fuentes, Miguel
Grolleau, Francois
Jain, Sneha S.
Chen, Jonathan
Dash, Devdutta
Char, Danton
Sharma, Aditya
McElfresh, Duncan
Scully, Patrick
Kumar, Vishanthan
Dennis, Clancy
OBrien, Connor
Mouniswamy, Satchi
Jones, Elvis
Jasti, Krishna
Lakshmanan, Gunavathi Mannika
Akula, Sree Ram
Singh, Varun Kumar
Rajmanickam, Ramesh
Sinha, Sudhir
Zhou, Vicky
Wang, Xu
Mawji, Bilal
Ge, Joshua
Li, Wencheng
Lyons, Travis
Helzer, Jarrod
Kakkar, Vikas
Powar, Ramesh
Batara, Darren
Cordova, Cheryl
Frederick III, William
Tang, Olivia
Morgan, Phoebe
Liang, April S.
Ma, Stephen P.
Vedak, Shivam
Yao, Dong-han
Swaminathan, Akshay
Kashyap, Mehr
Ng, Brian
Hellman, Jamie
Kotecha, Nikesh
Sharp, Christopher
Brown, Gretchen
Lindmark, Christian
Revri, Anurang
Pfeffer, Michael A.
author_facet Shah, Nigam H.
Ambers, Nerissa
Pandya, Abby
Keyes, Timothy
Banda, Juan M.
Nallan, Srikar
Lugtu, Carlene
Trotsyuk, Artem A.
Bedi, Suhana
Unell, Alyssa
Fuentes, Miguel
Grolleau, Francois
Jain, Sneha S.
Chen, Jonathan
Dash, Devdutta
Char, Danton
Sharma, Aditya
McElfresh, Duncan
Scully, Patrick
Kumar, Vishanthan
Dennis, Clancy
OBrien, Connor
Mouniswamy, Satchi
Jones, Elvis
Jasti, Krishna
Lakshmanan, Gunavathi Mannika
Akula, Sree Ram
Singh, Varun Kumar
Rajmanickam, Ramesh
Sinha, Sudhir
Zhou, Vicky
Wang, Xu
Mawji, Bilal
Ge, Joshua
Li, Wencheng
Lyons, Travis
Helzer, Jarrod
Kakkar, Vikas
Powar, Ramesh
Batara, Darren
Cordova, Cheryl
Frederick III, William
Tang, Olivia
Morgan, Phoebe
Liang, April S.
Ma, Stephen P.
Vedak, Shivam
Yao, Dong-han
Swaminathan, Akshay
Kashyap, Mehr
Ng, Brian
Hellman, Jamie
Kotecha, Nikesh
Sharp, Christopher
Brown, Gretchen
Lindmark, Christian
Revri, Anurang
Pfeffer, Michael A.
contents While large language models (LLMs) can support clinical documentation needs, standalone tools struggle with "workflow friction" from manual data entry. We developed ChatEHR, a system that enables the use of LLMs with the entire patient timeline spanning several years. ChatEHR enables automations - which are static combinations of prompts and data that perform a fixed task - and interactive use in the electronic health record (EHR) via a user interface (UI). The resulting ability to sift through patient medical records for diverse use-cases such as pre-visit chart review, screening for transfer eligibility, monitoring for surgical site infections, and chart abstraction, redefines LLM use as an institutional capability. This system, accessible after user-training, enables continuous monitoring and evaluation of LLM use. In 1.5 years, we built 7 automations and 1075 users have trained to become routine users of the UI, engaging in 23,000 sessions in the first 3 months of launch. For automations, being model-agnostic and accessing multiple types of data was essential for matching specific clinical or administrative tasks with the most appropriate LLM. Benchmark-based evaluations proved insufficient for monitoring and evaluation of the UI, requiring new methods to monitor performance. Generation of summaries was the most frequent task in the UI, with an estimated 0.73 hallucinations and 1.60 inaccuracies per generation. The resulting mix of cost savings, time savings, and revenue growth required a value assessment framework to prioritize work as well as quantify the impact of using LLMs. Initial estimates are $6M savings in the first year of use, without quantifying the benefit of the better care offered. Such a "build-from-within" strategy provides an opportunity for health systems to maintain agency via a vendor-agnostic, internally governed LLM platform.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2602_00074
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Adoption and Use of LLMs at an Academic Medical Center
Shah, Nigam H.
Ambers, Nerissa
Pandya, Abby
Keyes, Timothy
Banda, Juan M.
Nallan, Srikar
Lugtu, Carlene
Trotsyuk, Artem A.
Bedi, Suhana
Unell, Alyssa
Fuentes, Miguel
Grolleau, Francois
Jain, Sneha S.
Chen, Jonathan
Dash, Devdutta
Char, Danton
Sharma, Aditya
McElfresh, Duncan
Scully, Patrick
Kumar, Vishanthan
Dennis, Clancy
OBrien, Connor
Mouniswamy, Satchi
Jones, Elvis
Jasti, Krishna
Lakshmanan, Gunavathi Mannika
Akula, Sree Ram
Singh, Varun Kumar
Rajmanickam, Ramesh
Sinha, Sudhir
Zhou, Vicky
Wang, Xu
Mawji, Bilal
Ge, Joshua
Li, Wencheng
Lyons, Travis
Helzer, Jarrod
Kakkar, Vikas
Powar, Ramesh
Batara, Darren
Cordova, Cheryl
Frederick III, William
Tang, Olivia
Morgan, Phoebe
Liang, April S.
Ma, Stephen P.
Vedak, Shivam
Yao, Dong-han
Swaminathan, Akshay
Kashyap, Mehr
Ng, Brian
Hellman, Jamie
Kotecha, Nikesh
Sharp, Christopher
Brown, Gretchen
Lindmark, Christian
Revri, Anurang
Pfeffer, Michael A.
Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
While large language models (LLMs) can support clinical documentation needs, standalone tools struggle with "workflow friction" from manual data entry. We developed ChatEHR, a system that enables the use of LLMs with the entire patient timeline spanning several years. ChatEHR enables automations - which are static combinations of prompts and data that perform a fixed task - and interactive use in the electronic health record (EHR) via a user interface (UI). The resulting ability to sift through patient medical records for diverse use-cases such as pre-visit chart review, screening for transfer eligibility, monitoring for surgical site infections, and chart abstraction, redefines LLM use as an institutional capability. This system, accessible after user-training, enables continuous monitoring and evaluation of LLM use. In 1.5 years, we built 7 automations and 1075 users have trained to become routine users of the UI, engaging in 23,000 sessions in the first 3 months of launch. For automations, being model-agnostic and accessing multiple types of data was essential for matching specific clinical or administrative tasks with the most appropriate LLM. Benchmark-based evaluations proved insufficient for monitoring and evaluation of the UI, requiring new methods to monitor performance. Generation of summaries was the most frequent task in the UI, with an estimated 0.73 hallucinations and 1.60 inaccuracies per generation. The resulting mix of cost savings, time savings, and revenue growth required a value assessment framework to prioritize work as well as quantify the impact of using LLMs. Initial estimates are $6M savings in the first year of use, without quantifying the benefit of the better care offered. Such a "build-from-within" strategy provides an opportunity for health systems to maintain agency via a vendor-agnostic, internally governed LLM platform.
title Adoption and Use of LLMs at an Academic Medical Center
topic Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.00074