Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.00394 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866912864171720704 |
|---|---|
| author | Bethi, Manoj Reddy Jhade, Sai Rupa Yaganti, Pravallika Khan, Monoshiz Mahbub Yu, Zhe |
| author_facet | Bethi, Manoj Reddy Jhade, Sai Rupa Yaganti, Pravallika Khan, Monoshiz Mahbub Yu, Zhe |
| contents | Modeling human aesthetic judgments in visual art presents significant challenges due to individual preference variability and the high cost of obtaining labeled data. To reduce cost of acquiring such labels, we propose to apply a comparative learning framework based on pairwise preference assessments rather than direct ratings. This approach leverages the Law of Comparative Judgment, which posits that relative choices exhibit less cognitive burden and greater cognitive consistency than direct scoring. We extract deep convolutional features from painting images using ResNet-50 and develop both a deep neural network regression model and a dual-branch pairwise comparison model. We explored four research questions: (RQ1) How does the proposed deep neural network regression model with CNN features compare to the baseline linear regression model using hand-crafted features? (RQ2) How does pairwise comparative learning compare to regression-based prediction when lacking access to direct rating values? (RQ3) Can we predict individual rater preferences through within-rater and cross-rater analysis? (RQ4) What is the annotation cost trade-off between direct ratings and comparative judgments in terms of human time and effort? Our results show that the deep regression model substantially outperforms the baseline, achieving up to $328\%$ improvement in $R^2$. The comparative model approaches regression performance despite having no access to direct rating values, validating the practical utility of pairwise comparisons. However, predicting individual preferences remains challenging, with both within-rater and cross-rater performance significantly lower than average rating prediction. Human subject experiments reveal that comparative judgments require $60\%$ less annotation time per item, demonstrating superior annotation efficiency for large-scale preference modeling. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2602_00394 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Modeling Art Evaluations from Comparative Judgments: A Deep Learning Approach to Predicting Aesthetic Preferences Bethi, Manoj Reddy Jhade, Sai Rupa Yaganti, Pravallika Khan, Monoshiz Mahbub Yu, Zhe Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Modeling human aesthetic judgments in visual art presents significant challenges due to individual preference variability and the high cost of obtaining labeled data. To reduce cost of acquiring such labels, we propose to apply a comparative learning framework based on pairwise preference assessments rather than direct ratings. This approach leverages the Law of Comparative Judgment, which posits that relative choices exhibit less cognitive burden and greater cognitive consistency than direct scoring. We extract deep convolutional features from painting images using ResNet-50 and develop both a deep neural network regression model and a dual-branch pairwise comparison model. We explored four research questions: (RQ1) How does the proposed deep neural network regression model with CNN features compare to the baseline linear regression model using hand-crafted features? (RQ2) How does pairwise comparative learning compare to regression-based prediction when lacking access to direct rating values? (RQ3) Can we predict individual rater preferences through within-rater and cross-rater analysis? (RQ4) What is the annotation cost trade-off between direct ratings and comparative judgments in terms of human time and effort? Our results show that the deep regression model substantially outperforms the baseline, achieving up to $328\%$ improvement in $R^2$. The comparative model approaches regression performance despite having no access to direct rating values, validating the practical utility of pairwise comparisons. However, predicting individual preferences remains challenging, with both within-rater and cross-rater performance significantly lower than average rating prediction. Human subject experiments reveal that comparative judgments require $60\%$ less annotation time per item, demonstrating superior annotation efficiency for large-scale preference modeling. |
| title | Modeling Art Evaluations from Comparative Judgments: A Deep Learning Approach to Predicting Aesthetic Preferences |
| topic | Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.00394 |