Best Proximity Point Results for Perimetric Contractions
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2026
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866917238701817856 |
|---|---|
| author | Garai, Hiranmoy Petrov, Evgeniy Mondal, Pratikshan Dey, Lakshmi Kanta |
| author_facet | Garai, Hiranmoy Petrov, Evgeniy Mondal, Pratikshan Dey, Lakshmi Kanta |
| contents | This paper has two aims, first one is to introduce special kind of proximal contractions guaranteeing a finite number of best proximity points, and second one is to derive best proximity point results for perimetric contractions. To meet these two aims, we introduce two new proximal contractions: perimetric proximal contractions of the first and the second kind, and derive best proximity point results for these mappings. We establish that for these particular mappings, best proximity points are not necessarily unique; however, we provide an upper bound, proving that at most two such points can exist. To establish the validity of our results, we provide illustrative examples demonstrating that these newly defined mappings can possess unique or exactly two best proximity points. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2602_00645 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Best Proximity Point Results for Perimetric Contractions Garai, Hiranmoy Petrov, Evgeniy Mondal, Pratikshan Dey, Lakshmi Kanta General Topology 47H10, 54H25 This paper has two aims, first one is to introduce special kind of proximal contractions guaranteeing a finite number of best proximity points, and second one is to derive best proximity point results for perimetric contractions. To meet these two aims, we introduce two new proximal contractions: perimetric proximal contractions of the first and the second kind, and derive best proximity point results for these mappings. We establish that for these particular mappings, best proximity points are not necessarily unique; however, we provide an upper bound, proving that at most two such points can exist. To establish the validity of our results, we provide illustrative examples demonstrating that these newly defined mappings can possess unique or exactly two best proximity points. |
| title | Best Proximity Point Results for Perimetric Contractions |
| topic | General Topology 47H10, 54H25 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.00645 |