PersistBench: When Should Long-Term Memories Be Forgotten by LLMs?

Fuente: arXiv
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Pulipaka, Sidharth, Chen, Oliver, Sharma, Manas, Bajwa, Taaha S, Raina, Vyas, Sheth, Ivaxi
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2026
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866912866827763712
author Pulipaka, Sidharth
Chen, Oliver
Sharma, Manas
Bajwa, Taaha S
Raina, Vyas
Sheth, Ivaxi
author_facet Pulipaka, Sidharth
Chen, Oliver
Sharma, Manas
Bajwa, Taaha S
Raina, Vyas
Sheth, Ivaxi
contents Conversational assistants are increasingly integrating long-term memory with large language models (LLMs). This persistence of memories, e.g., the user is vegetarian, can enhance personalization in future conversations. However, the same persistence can also introduce safety risks that have been largely overlooked. Hence, we introduce PersistBench to measure the extent of these safety risks. We identify two long-term memory-specific risks: cross-domain leakage, where LLMs inappropriately inject context from the long-term memories; and memory-induced sycophancy, where stored long-term memories insidiously reinforce user biases. We evaluate 18 frontier and open-source LLMs on our benchmark. Our results reveal a surprisingly high failure rate across these LLMs - a median failure rate of 53% on cross-domain samples and 97% on sycophancy samples. To address this, our benchmark encourages the development of more robust and safer long-term memory usage in frontier conversational systems.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2602_01146
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle PersistBench: When Should Long-Term Memories Be Forgotten by LLMs?
Pulipaka, Sidharth
Chen, Oliver
Sharma, Manas
Bajwa, Taaha S
Raina, Vyas
Sheth, Ivaxi
Artificial Intelligence
I.2.7
Conversational assistants are increasingly integrating long-term memory with large language models (LLMs). This persistence of memories, e.g., the user is vegetarian, can enhance personalization in future conversations. However, the same persistence can also introduce safety risks that have been largely overlooked. Hence, we introduce PersistBench to measure the extent of these safety risks. We identify two long-term memory-specific risks: cross-domain leakage, where LLMs inappropriately inject context from the long-term memories; and memory-induced sycophancy, where stored long-term memories insidiously reinforce user biases. We evaluate 18 frontier and open-source LLMs on our benchmark. Our results reveal a surprisingly high failure rate across these LLMs - a median failure rate of 53% on cross-domain samples and 97% on sycophancy samples. To address this, our benchmark encourages the development of more robust and safer long-term memory usage in frontier conversational systems.
title PersistBench: When Should Long-Term Memories Be Forgotten by LLMs?
topic Artificial Intelligence
I.2.7
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.01146