Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zou, Jiaxuan, Xiong, Yaozhong, Liu, Yong
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.01148
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866908802664628224
author Zou, Jiaxuan
Xiong, Yaozhong
Liu, Yong
author_facet Zou, Jiaxuan
Xiong, Yaozhong
Liu, Yong
contents Latent Chain-of-Thought (Latent CoT) models promise efficient reasoning via continuous representations, yet exhibit puzzling performance inconsistencies: excelling at exploration (ProsQA: 97.0%) but failing at computation (GSM8K: 34.1%). We reveal that this trade-off is governed by decisional certainty. Our contributions are threefold: (1) We theoretically characterize the fundamental Exploration-Execution Trade-off, proving that high certainty enables precise execution but inhibits exploration, while low certainty facilitates search but causes error accumulation. (2) We introduce the Symbolic Index--quantifying decisional commitment--as the core mechanism governing this trade-off and establish its causal relationship with both execution stability and exploration capability. (3) We prove that curriculum learning is theoretically necessary, as direct training provably fails due to distributional mismatch. Our framework shifts the design paradigm from binary architectural choices toward adaptive systems that dynamically regulate decisional certainty based on task demands.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2602_01148
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Capabilities and Fundamental Limits of Latent Chain-of-Thought
Zou, Jiaxuan
Xiong, Yaozhong
Liu, Yong
Artificial Intelligence
Information Theory
Machine Learning
Optimization and Control
Latent Chain-of-Thought (Latent CoT) models promise efficient reasoning via continuous representations, yet exhibit puzzling performance inconsistencies: excelling at exploration (ProsQA: 97.0%) but failing at computation (GSM8K: 34.1%). We reveal that this trade-off is governed by decisional certainty. Our contributions are threefold: (1) We theoretically characterize the fundamental Exploration-Execution Trade-off, proving that high certainty enables precise execution but inhibits exploration, while low certainty facilitates search but causes error accumulation. (2) We introduce the Symbolic Index--quantifying decisional commitment--as the core mechanism governing this trade-off and establish its causal relationship with both execution stability and exploration capability. (3) We prove that curriculum learning is theoretically necessary, as direct training provably fails due to distributional mismatch. Our framework shifts the design paradigm from binary architectural choices toward adaptive systems that dynamically regulate decisional certainty based on task demands.
title Capabilities and Fundamental Limits of Latent Chain-of-Thought
topic Artificial Intelligence
Information Theory
Machine Learning
Optimization and Control
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.01148