How Users Perceive Mixed-Initiative AI: Attitudes Toward Assistance in Problem Solving
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2026
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866914300418850816 |
|---|---|
| author | Luo, Yunhao Caetano, Arthur Nargund, Avinash Ajit Höllerer, Tobias Sra, Misha |
| author_facet | Luo, Yunhao Caetano, Arthur Nargund, Avinash Ajit Höllerer, Tobias Sra, Misha |
| contents | In mixed-initiative systems, the mode of AI assistance delivery can be as consequential as the assistance itself. We investigated two assistance delivery modes: on-demand help (users request via Button) and pre-scheduled help (assistance delivered at user-selected intervals, with user actions resetting the Timer). To evaluate these modes, we selected Rush Hour puzzles as the human-AI collaborative task because they capture elements of real-world problem solving such as analysis, resource management, and decision-making under constraints. To enhance ecological validity, we imposed monetary costs for both time and AI assistance, simulating scenarios where people must balance implicit or explicit trade-offs such as time pressure, financial limitations, or opportunity costs. Although task performance was comparable across modes, participants who used the pre-scheduled (Timer) mode reported more positive perceptions of the AI, even when their ending budget was low. This suggests that assistance delivery mode can shape user experience independent of task outcomes, indicating that human-AI systems may need to consider how AI assistance is delivered alongside improving task performance. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2602_01481 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | How Users Perceive Mixed-Initiative AI: Attitudes Toward Assistance in Problem Solving Luo, Yunhao Caetano, Arthur Nargund, Avinash Ajit Höllerer, Tobias Sra, Misha Human-Computer Interaction In mixed-initiative systems, the mode of AI assistance delivery can be as consequential as the assistance itself. We investigated two assistance delivery modes: on-demand help (users request via Button) and pre-scheduled help (assistance delivered at user-selected intervals, with user actions resetting the Timer). To evaluate these modes, we selected Rush Hour puzzles as the human-AI collaborative task because they capture elements of real-world problem solving such as analysis, resource management, and decision-making under constraints. To enhance ecological validity, we imposed monetary costs for both time and AI assistance, simulating scenarios where people must balance implicit or explicit trade-offs such as time pressure, financial limitations, or opportunity costs. Although task performance was comparable across modes, participants who used the pre-scheduled (Timer) mode reported more positive perceptions of the AI, even when their ending budget was low. This suggests that assistance delivery mode can shape user experience independent of task outcomes, indicating that human-AI systems may need to consider how AI assistance is delivered alongside improving task performance. |
| title | How Users Perceive Mixed-Initiative AI: Attitudes Toward Assistance in Problem Solving |
| topic | Human-Computer Interaction |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.01481 |