Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.02022 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866918319176548352 |
|---|---|
| author | Lauga, Guillaume Vaiter, Samuel |
| author_facet | Lauga, Guillaume Vaiter, Samuel |
| contents | Proximal operators are now ubiquitous in non-smooth optimization. Since their introduction in the seminal work of Moreau, many papers have shown their effectiveness on a wide variety of problems, culminating in their use to construct convergent deep learning methods. The characterization of these operators for non-convex penalties was completed recently in [Gribonval et al, A characterization of proximity operators, 2020]. In this paper, we propose to follow this line of work by characterizing inexact proximal operators, thus providing an answer to what constitutes a good approximation of these operators. We propose several definitions of approximations and discuss their regularity, approximation power, and their fixed points. Equipped with these characterizations, we investigate the convergence of proximal algorithms in the presence of errors that may be non-summable and/or non-vanishing. In particular, we look at the proximal point algorithm, and at the forward-backward, Peaceman-Rachford and Douglas-Rachford algorithms when we minimize the sum of a weakly convex function (whose proximal operator is approximated) and a strongly convex function. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2602_02022 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Characterizations of inexact proximal operators Lauga, Guillaume Vaiter, Samuel Optimization and Control Proximal operators are now ubiquitous in non-smooth optimization. Since their introduction in the seminal work of Moreau, many papers have shown their effectiveness on a wide variety of problems, culminating in their use to construct convergent deep learning methods. The characterization of these operators for non-convex penalties was completed recently in [Gribonval et al, A characterization of proximity operators, 2020]. In this paper, we propose to follow this line of work by characterizing inexact proximal operators, thus providing an answer to what constitutes a good approximation of these operators. We propose several definitions of approximations and discuss their regularity, approximation power, and their fixed points. Equipped with these characterizations, we investigate the convergence of proximal algorithms in the presence of errors that may be non-summable and/or non-vanishing. In particular, we look at the proximal point algorithm, and at the forward-backward, Peaceman-Rachford and Douglas-Rachford algorithms when we minimize the sum of a weakly convex function (whose proximal operator is approximated) and a strongly convex function. |
| title | Characterizations of inexact proximal operators |
| topic | Optimization and Control |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.02022 |