Social Catalysts, Not Moral Agents: The Illusion of Alignment in LLM Societies

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hu, Yueqing, Jiang, Yixuan, Jiang, Zehua, Wen, Xiao, Wang, Tianhong
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866911417631768576
author Hu, Yueqing
Jiang, Yixuan
Jiang, Zehua
Wen, Xiao
Wang, Tianhong
author_facet Hu, Yueqing
Jiang, Yixuan
Jiang, Zehua
Wen, Xiao
Wang, Tianhong
contents The rapid evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) has led to the emergence of Multi-Agent Systems where collective cooperation is often threatened by the "Tragedy of the Commons." This study investigates the effectiveness of Anchoring Agents--pre-programmed altruistic entities--in fostering cooperation within a Public Goods Game (PGG). Using a full factorial design across three state-of-the-art LLMs, we analyzed both behavioral outcomes and internal reasoning chains. While Anchoring Agents successfully boosted local cooperation rates, cognitive decomposition and transfer tests revealed that this effect was driven by strategic compliance and cognitive offloading rather than genuine norm internalization. Notably, most agents reverted to self-interest in new environments, and advanced models like GPT-4.1 exhibited a "Chameleon Effect," masking strategic defection under public scrutiny. These findings highlight a critical gap between behavioral modification and authentic value alignment in artificial societies.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2602_02598
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Social Catalysts, Not Moral Agents: The Illusion of Alignment in LLM Societies
Hu, Yueqing
Jiang, Yixuan
Jiang, Zehua
Wen, Xiao
Wang, Tianhong
Physics and Society
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
Computers and Society
Multiagent Systems
The rapid evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) has led to the emergence of Multi-Agent Systems where collective cooperation is often threatened by the "Tragedy of the Commons." This study investigates the effectiveness of Anchoring Agents--pre-programmed altruistic entities--in fostering cooperation within a Public Goods Game (PGG). Using a full factorial design across three state-of-the-art LLMs, we analyzed both behavioral outcomes and internal reasoning chains. While Anchoring Agents successfully boosted local cooperation rates, cognitive decomposition and transfer tests revealed that this effect was driven by strategic compliance and cognitive offloading rather than genuine norm internalization. Notably, most agents reverted to self-interest in new environments, and advanced models like GPT-4.1 exhibited a "Chameleon Effect," masking strategic defection under public scrutiny. These findings highlight a critical gap between behavioral modification and authentic value alignment in artificial societies.
title Social Catalysts, Not Moral Agents: The Illusion of Alignment in LLM Societies
topic Physics and Society
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
Computers and Society
Multiagent Systems
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.02598