Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: You, Jihao, Tulpan, Dan, Diao, Jiaojiao, Ellis, Jennifer L.
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2026
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05239
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866908814253490176
author You, Jihao
Tulpan, Dan
Diao, Jiaojiao
Ellis, Jennifer L.
author_facet You, Jihao
Tulpan, Dan
Diao, Jiaojiao
Ellis, Jennifer L.
contents While regression models capture the relationship between predictors and the response variable, they often lack intuitive accompanying methods to understand the influence of predictors on the outcome. To address this, we introduce an interpretability method called Impact Range Assessment (IRA), which quantifies the maximal influence of each predictor by measuring the total potential change in the response variable, across the predictor range. Validation using synthetic linear and nonlinear datasets demonstrates that relevant predictors produced higher IRA values than irrelevant ones. Moreover, repeated evaluations produced results closely aligned with those from the single-execution analysis, confirming the robustness of the method. A case study using a model that predicts pellet quality demonstrated that the IRA provides a simple and intuitive approach to interpret and rank predictor influence, thereby improving model transparency and reliability.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2602_05239
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Impact Range Assessment (IRA): An Interpretable Sensitivity Measure for Regression Modelling
You, Jihao
Tulpan, Dan
Diao, Jiaojiao
Ellis, Jennifer L.
Methodology
While regression models capture the relationship between predictors and the response variable, they often lack intuitive accompanying methods to understand the influence of predictors on the outcome. To address this, we introduce an interpretability method called Impact Range Assessment (IRA), which quantifies the maximal influence of each predictor by measuring the total potential change in the response variable, across the predictor range. Validation using synthetic linear and nonlinear datasets demonstrates that relevant predictors produced higher IRA values than irrelevant ones. Moreover, repeated evaluations produced results closely aligned with those from the single-execution analysis, confirming the robustness of the method. A case study using a model that predicts pellet quality demonstrated that the IRA provides a simple and intuitive approach to interpret and rank predictor influence, thereby improving model transparency and reliability.
title Impact Range Assessment (IRA): An Interpretable Sensitivity Measure for Regression Modelling
topic Methodology
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05239