Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05671 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866915777849851904 |
|---|---|
| author | Rudaz, Damien Carreras, Barbara Nino Merlino, Sara Due, Brian L. Brown, Barry |
| author_facet | Rudaz, Damien Carreras, Barbara Nino Merlino, Sara Due, Brian L. Brown, Barry |
| contents | Does human-AI assistance unfold in the same way as human-human assistance? This research explores what can be learned from the expertise of blind individuals and sighted volunteers to inform the design of multimodal voice agents and address the enduring challenge of proactivity. Drawing on granular analysis of two representative fragments from a larger corpus, we contrast the practices co-produced by an experienced human remote sighted assistant and a blind participant-as they collaborate to find a stain on a blanket over the phone-with those achieved when the same participant worked with a multimodal voice agent on the same task, a few moments earlier. This comparison enables us to specify precisely which fundamental proactive practices the agent did not enact in situ. We conclude that, so long as multimodal voice agents cannot produce environmentally occasioned vision-based actions, they will lack a key resource relied upon by human remote sighted assistants. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2602_05671 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | (Computer) Vision in Action: Comparing Remote Sighted Assistance and a Multimodal Voice Agent in Inspection Sequences Rudaz, Damien Carreras, Barbara Nino Merlino, Sara Due, Brian L. Brown, Barry Human-Computer Interaction Does human-AI assistance unfold in the same way as human-human assistance? This research explores what can be learned from the expertise of blind individuals and sighted volunteers to inform the design of multimodal voice agents and address the enduring challenge of proactivity. Drawing on granular analysis of two representative fragments from a larger corpus, we contrast the practices co-produced by an experienced human remote sighted assistant and a blind participant-as they collaborate to find a stain on a blanket over the phone-with those achieved when the same participant worked with a multimodal voice agent on the same task, a few moments earlier. This comparison enables us to specify precisely which fundamental proactive practices the agent did not enact in situ. We conclude that, so long as multimodal voice agents cannot produce environmentally occasioned vision-based actions, they will lack a key resource relied upon by human remote sighted assistants. |
| title | (Computer) Vision in Action: Comparing Remote Sighted Assistance and a Multimodal Voice Agent in Inspection Sequences |
| topic | Human-Computer Interaction |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05671 |