Enregistré dans:
| Auteurs principaux: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Publié: |
2026
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.06210 |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1866908816749101056 |
|---|---|
| author | Chiroque-Solano, Pamela M. Van Horn, M Lee Jaki, Thomas |
| author_facet | Chiroque-Solano, Pamela M. Van Horn, M Lee Jaki, Thomas |
| contents | Precision medicine seeks to match patients with treatments that produce the greatest benefit. The Predicted Individual Treatment Effect (PITE)-the difference between predicted outcomes under treatment and control-quantifies this benefit but is difficult to estimate due to unobserved counterfactuals, high dimensionality, and complex interactions. We compared 30+ modeling strategies, including penalized and projection-based methods, flexible learners, and tree-ensembles, using a structured simulation framework varying sample size, dimensionality, multicollinearity, and interaction complexity. Performance was measured using root mean squared error (RMSE) for prediction accuracy and directional accuracy (DIR) for correctly classifying benefit versus harm. Internal validation produced optimistic estimates, whereas external validation with distributional shifts and higher-order interactions more clearly revealed model weaknesses. Penalized and projection-based approaches-ridge, lasso, elastic net, partial least squares (PLS), and principal components regression (PCR)-consistently achieved strong RMSE and DIR performance. Flexible learners excelled only under strong signals and sufficient sample sizes. Results highlight robust linear/projection defaults and the necessity of rigorous external validation. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2602_06210 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Evaluating Predictive Modeling Strategies for Predicting Individual Treatment Effects in Precision Medicine Chiroque-Solano, Pamela M. Van Horn, M Lee Jaki, Thomas Applications Precision medicine seeks to match patients with treatments that produce the greatest benefit. The Predicted Individual Treatment Effect (PITE)-the difference between predicted outcomes under treatment and control-quantifies this benefit but is difficult to estimate due to unobserved counterfactuals, high dimensionality, and complex interactions. We compared 30+ modeling strategies, including penalized and projection-based methods, flexible learners, and tree-ensembles, using a structured simulation framework varying sample size, dimensionality, multicollinearity, and interaction complexity. Performance was measured using root mean squared error (RMSE) for prediction accuracy and directional accuracy (DIR) for correctly classifying benefit versus harm. Internal validation produced optimistic estimates, whereas external validation with distributional shifts and higher-order interactions more clearly revealed model weaknesses. Penalized and projection-based approaches-ridge, lasso, elastic net, partial least squares (PLS), and principal components regression (PCR)-consistently achieved strong RMSE and DIR performance. Flexible learners excelled only under strong signals and sufficient sample sizes. Results highlight robust linear/projection defaults and the necessity of rigorous external validation. |
| title | Evaluating Predictive Modeling Strategies for Predicting Individual Treatment Effects in Precision Medicine |
| topic | Applications |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.06210 |